lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <70234187-3e7d-4932-8b07-42973337ecb1@lunn.ch> Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 16:42:02 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> To: David Epping <david.epping@...singlinkelectronics.com> Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/3] net: phy: mscc: enable VSC8501/2 RGMII RX clock > Its my first patch re-submission, so sorry for the noob question: > Should I include your "pw-bot: changes-requested" tag with the third > patch? Probably not. No. There is a robot listening to emails, and when it sees pw-bot: It uses the label to change the state of the patch in patchworks: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/ The robot does have some basic authentication, so it should actually ignore such a line from you, since you are not a Maintainer. But even so, you don't want to make your own new patches as needing changes. Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists