netdev - Re: [PATCH net 3/3] net: phy: mscc: enable VSC8501/2 RGMII RX clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 16:42:02 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: David Epping <david.epping@...singlinkelectronics.com>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/3] net: phy: mscc: enable VSC8501/2 RGMII RX clock

> Its my first patch re-submission, so sorry for the noob question:
> Should I include your "pw-bot: changes-requested" tag with the third
> patch? Probably not.

No.

There is a robot listening to emails, and when it sees pw-bot: It uses
the label to change the state of the patch in patchworks:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/

The robot does have some basic authentication, so it should actually
ignore such a line from you, since you are not a Maintainer. But even
so, you don't want to make your own new patches as needing changes.

    Andrew