lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <mafs0cz2sxpq8.fsf@amazon.de> Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 19:03:59 +0200 From: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@...zon.de> To: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>, "Willem de Bruijn" <willemb@...gle.com>, Norbert Manthey <nmanthey@...zon.de>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: fix skb leak in __skb_tstamp_tx() On Mon, May 22 2023, SeongJae Park wrote: > Hi Pratyush, > > On Mon, 22 May 2023 17:30:20 +0200 Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@...zon.de> wrote: > >> Commit 50749f2dd685 ("tcp/udp: Fix memleaks of sk and zerocopy skbs with >> TX timestamp.") added a call to skb_orphan_frags_rx() to fix leaks with >> zerocopy skbs. But it ended up adding a leak of its own. When >> skb_orphan_frags_rx() fails, the function just returns, leaking the skb >> it just cloned. Free it before returning. >> >> This bug was discovered and resolved using Coverity Static Analysis >> Security Testing (SAST) by Synopsys, Inc. >> >> Fixes: 50749f2dd685 ("tcp/udp: Fix memleaks of sk and zerocopy skbs with TX timestamp.") > > Seems the commit has merged in several stable kernels. Is the bug also > affecting those? If so, would it be better to Cc stable@...r.kernel.org? > It affects v5.4.243 at least, since that is where I first saw this. But I would expect it to affect other stable kernels it has been backported to as well. I thought using the Fixes tag pointing to the bad upstream commit would be enough for the stable maintainers' tooling/bots to pick this patch up. In either case, +Cc stable. Link to the patch this thread is talking about [0]. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230522153020.32422-1-ptyadav@amazon.de/T/#u > > > Thanks, > SJ > >> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@...zon.de> >> --- >> >> I do not know this code very well, this was caught by our static >> analysis tool. I did not try specifically reproducing the leak but I did >> do a boot test by adding this patch on 6.4-rc3 and the kernel boots >> fine. >> >> net/core/skbuff.c | 4 +++- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c >> index 515ec5cdc79c..cea28d30abb5 100644 >> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c >> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c >> @@ -5224,8 +5224,10 @@ void __skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb, >> } else { >> skb = skb_clone(orig_skb, GFP_ATOMIC); >> >> - if (skb_orphan_frags_rx(skb, GFP_ATOMIC)) >> + if (skb_orphan_frags_rx(skb, GFP_ATOMIC)) { >> + kfree_skb(skb); >> return; >> + } >> } >> if (!skb) >> return; >> -- >> 2.39.2 >> -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH Krausenstr. 38 10117 Berlin Geschaeftsfuehrung: Christian Schlaeger, Jonathan Weiss Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg unter HRB 149173 B Sitz: Berlin Ust-ID: DE 289 237 879
Powered by blists - more mailing lists