netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net: fix skb leak in __skb_tstamp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 20:57:16 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, nmanthey@...zon.de, 
	pabeni@...hat.com, ptyadav@...zon.de, willemb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: fix skb leak in __skb_tstamp_tx()

On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 7:33 PM SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org> wrote:

> Sorry for continuing adding noises, but seems the process is, or will be,
> changed by to the mainline commit dbbe7c962c3a8 ("docs: networking: drop
> special stable handling").

Whoever backported the patch because it had a Fixes: tag will do the
same if another patch also has a Fixes: tag.

I personally prefer Fixes: very precise tags to weak ones.