netdev - Re: [PATCH] igb: Fix igb_down hung on surprise removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANEJEGuzoBa_yYHRCa0KygUe=AOhUkSg4u6gWx+QNCuGtKod2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 13:16:12 -0700
From: Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>
To: Pavan Chebbi <pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com>
Cc: Ying Hsu <yinghsu@...omium.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, grundler@...omium.org, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, 
	intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] igb: Fix igb_down hung on surprise removal

On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 3:36 AM Pavan Chebbi <pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 12:58 PM Ying Hsu <yinghsu@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> > index 58872a4c2540..a8b217368ca1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> > @@ -9581,6 +9581,11 @@ static pci_ers_result_t igb_io_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> >         struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >         struct igb_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> >
> > +       if (state == pci_channel_io_normal) {
> > +               dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Non-correctable non-fatal error reported.\n");
> > +               return PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER;
> > +       }
> > +
>
> This code may be good to have. But not sure if this should be the fix
> for igb_down() synchronization.

I have the same opinion. This appears to solve the problem - but I
don't know if there is a better way to solve this problem.

> Intel guys may comment.

Ping? Can we please get feedback from IGB/IGC maintainers this week?

(I hope igc maintainers can confirm this isn't an issue for igc.)

cheers,
grant

>
> >         netif_device_detach(netdev);
> >
> >         if (state == pci_channel_io_perm_failure)
> > --
> > 2.40.1.606.ga4b1b128d6-goog
> >
> >