netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/3] scm: add SO_PASSPIDFD and SCM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 13:34:09 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, David Ahern
 <dsahern@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Kees Cook
 <keescook@...omium.org>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Kuniyuki
 Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>, Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>,
 Luca Boccassi <bluca@...ian.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/3] scm: add SO_PASSPIDFD and SCM_PIDFD

On Mon, 22 May 2023 15:24:37 +0200 Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> v6:
> 	- disable feature when CONFIG_UNIX=n/m (pidfd_prepare API is not exported to modules)

IMHO hiding the code under #if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_UNRELATED) is
surprising to the user and.. ugly?

Can we move scm_pidfd_recv() into a C source and export that?
That should be less controversial than exporting pidfd_prepare()
directly?