[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD8CoPDASe7hpkFbK+UzJats7j4sbgsCh_P4zaQYVuKD7jWu2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 10:07:42 +0800
From: Ze Gao <zegao2021@...il.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@...a.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kafai@...com, kpsingh@...omium.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
paulmck@...nel.org, songliubraving@...com, Ze Gao <zegao@...cent.com>
Subject: Re:
Oops, I missed that. Thanks for pointing that out, which I thought is
conditional use of rcu_is_watching before.
One last point, I think we should double check on this
"fentry does not filter with !rcu_is_watching"
as quoted from Yonghong and argue whether it needs
the same check for fentry as well.
Regards,
Ze
Powered by blists - more mailing lists