[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f5ef5b1-ce52-1426-fe68-55c769885f9a@microchip.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 06:15:38 +0000
From: <Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com>
To: <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: <hkallweit1@...il.com>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<ramon.nordin.rodriguez@...roamp.se>, <Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com>,
<Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
<Thorsten.Kummermehr@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] net: phy: microchip_t1s: replace
read-modify-write code with phy_modify_mmd
Hi Andrew,
On 22/05/23 6:01 pm, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
>>
>> /* Read-Modified Write Pseudocode (from AN1699)
>> * current_val = read_register(mmd, addr) // Read current register value
>
> Hi Parthiban
>
> Maybe extend the comment to indicate that although AN1699 says Read,
> Modify, Write, the write is not required if the register already has
> the required value. That is what phy_modify_mmd() actually does.
Sure, I will add it in the next version.
Best Regards,
Parthiban V
>
>> @@ -74,12 +72,11 @@ static int lan867x_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> * write_register(mmd, addr, new_val) // Write back updated register value
>> */
>> for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lan867x_fixup_registers); i++) {
>> - reg = lan867x_fixup_registers[i];
>> - reg_value = phy_read_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, reg);
>> - reg_value &= ~lan867x_fixup_masks[i];
>> - reg_value |= lan867x_fixup_values[i];
>> - err = phy_write_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, reg, reg_value);
>> - if (err != 0)
>> + err = phy_modify_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND2,
>> + lan867x_fixup_registers[i],
>> + lan867x_fixup_masks[i],
>> + lan867x_fixup_values[i]);
>> + if (err)
>> return err;
>> }
>
>
> Andrew
>
> ---
> pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists