[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230523054242.21596-11-saeed@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 22:42:37 -0700
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Shay Drory <shayd@...dia.com>,
Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>
Subject: [net 10/15] net/mlx5: E-switch, Devcom, sync devcom events and devcom comp register
From: Shay Drory <shayd@...dia.com>
devcom events are sent to all registered component. Following the
cited patch, it is possible for two components, e.g.: two eswitches,
to send devcom events, while both components are registered. This
means eswitch layer will do double un/pairing, which is double
allocation and free of resources, even though only one un/pairing is
needed. flow example:
cpu0 cpu1
---- ----
mlx5_devlink_eswitch_mode_set(dev0)
esw_offloads_devcom_init()
mlx5_devcom_register_component(esw0)
mlx5_devlink_eswitch_mode_set(dev1)
esw_offloads_devcom_init()
mlx5_devcom_register_component(esw1)
mlx5_devcom_send_event()
mlx5_devcom_send_event()
Hence, check whether the eswitches are already un/paired before
free/allocation of resources.
Fixes: 09b278462f16 ("net: devlink: enable parallel ops on netlink interface")
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h | 1 +
.../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c | 9 ++++++++-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
index 9f007c5438ee..add6cfa432a5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
@@ -342,6 +342,7 @@ struct mlx5_eswitch {
u32 large_group_num;
} params;
struct blocking_notifier_head n_head;
+ bool paired[MLX5_MAX_PORTS];
};
void esw_offloads_disable(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
index 7c34c7cf506f..8d19c20d3447 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
@@ -2742,6 +2742,9 @@ static int mlx5_esw_offloads_devcom_event(int event,
mlx5_eswitch_vport_match_metadata_enabled(peer_esw))
break;
+ if (esw->paired[mlx5_get_dev_index(peer_esw->dev)])
+ break;
+
err = mlx5_esw_offloads_set_ns_peer(esw, peer_esw, true);
if (err)
goto err_out;
@@ -2753,14 +2756,18 @@ static int mlx5_esw_offloads_devcom_event(int event,
if (err)
goto err_pair;
+ esw->paired[mlx5_get_dev_index(peer_esw->dev)] = true;
+ peer_esw->paired[mlx5_get_dev_index(esw->dev)] = true;
mlx5_devcom_set_paired(devcom, MLX5_DEVCOM_ESW_OFFLOADS, true);
break;
case ESW_OFFLOADS_DEVCOM_UNPAIR:
- if (!mlx5_devcom_is_paired(devcom, MLX5_DEVCOM_ESW_OFFLOADS))
+ if (!esw->paired[mlx5_get_dev_index(peer_esw->dev)])
break;
mlx5_devcom_set_paired(devcom, MLX5_DEVCOM_ESW_OFFLOADS, false);
+ esw->paired[mlx5_get_dev_index(peer_esw->dev)] = false;
+ peer_esw->paired[mlx5_get_dev_index(esw->dev)] = false;
mlx5_esw_offloads_unpair(peer_esw);
mlx5_esw_offloads_unpair(esw);
mlx5_esw_offloads_set_ns_peer(esw, peer_esw, false);
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists