[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230523123801.2007784-3-jiri@resnulli.us>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 14:38:00 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
leon@...nel.org,
saeedm@...dia.com,
moshe@...dia.com
Subject: [patch net-next 2/3] devlink: remove no longer true locking comment from port_new/del()
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
All commands are called holding instance lock. Remove the outdated
comment that says otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
---
include/net/devlink.h | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
index ccea6e079777..24a48f3d4c35 100644
--- a/include/net/devlink.h
+++ b/include/net/devlink.h
@@ -1506,8 +1506,6 @@ struct devlink_ops {
* attributes
*
* Notes:
- * - Called without devlink instance lock being held. Drivers must
- * implement own means of synchronization
* - On success, drivers must register a port with devlink core
*
* Return: 0 on success, negative value otherwise.
@@ -1525,8 +1523,6 @@ struct devlink_ops {
* to delete a previously created port function
*
* Notes:
- * - Called without devlink instance lock being held. Drivers must
- * implement own means of synchronization
* - On success, drivers must unregister the corresponding devlink
* port
*
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists