[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c025952ddc527f0b60b2c476bb30bd45e9863d41.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 15:52:06 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
edumazet@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org,
kuba@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net/tcp: optimise locking for blocking
splice
On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 14:33 +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Even when tcp_splice_read() reads all it was asked for, for blocking
> sockets it'll release and immediately regrab the socket lock, loop
> around and break on the while check.
>
> Check tss.len right after we adjust it, and return if we're done.
> That saves us one release_sock(); lock_sock(); pair per successful
> blocking splice read.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/tcp.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> index 4d6392c16b7a..bf7627f37e69 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> @@ -789,13 +789,15 @@ ssize_t tcp_splice_read(struct socket *sock, loff_t *ppos,
> */
> if (unlikely(*ppos))
> return -ESPIPE;
> + if (unlikely(!tss.len))
> + return 0;
>
> ret = spliced = 0;
>
> lock_sock(sk);
>
> timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, sock->file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
> - while (tss.len) {
> + while (true) {
> ret = __tcp_splice_read(sk, &tss);
> if (ret < 0)
> break;
> @@ -835,10 +837,10 @@ ssize_t tcp_splice_read(struct socket *sock, loff_t *ppos,
> }
> continue;
> }
> - tss.len -= ret;
> spliced += ret;
> + tss.len -= ret;
The patch LGTM. The only minor thing that I note is that the above
chunk is not needed. Perhaps avoiding unneeded delta could be worthy.
Cheers,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists