netdev - Re: kprobes and rcu_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230523101041.23ca7cc8@rorschach.local.home>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 10:10:41 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ze Gao <zegao2021@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...a.com>, Alexei
 Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Daniel
 Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, John
 Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Martin
 KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
 Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Yonghong
 Song <yhs@...com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kafai@...com, kpsingh@...omium.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...nel.org, songliubraving@...com, Ze Gao
 <zegao@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: kprobes and rcu_is_watching()

[ Added a subject, as I always want to delete these emails as spam! ]

On Mon, 22 May 2023 10:07:42 +0800
Ze Gao <zegao2021@...il.com> wrote:

> Oops, I missed that. Thanks for pointing that out, which I thought is
> conditional use of rcu_is_watching before.
> 
> One last point, I think we should double check on this
>      "fentry does not filter with !rcu_is_watching"
> as quoted from Yonghong and argue whether it needs
> the same check for fentry as well.
> 

Note that trace_test_and_set_recursion() (which is used by
ftrace_test_recursion_trylock()) checks for rcu_is_watching() and
returns false if it isn't (and the trylock will fail).

-- Steve