netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2-next 5/9] dcb: app: modify dcb_app_parse_mapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <878rdf57m9.fsf@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 18:29:28 +0200
From: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
To: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <dsahern@...nel.org>,
	<stephen@...workplumber.org>, <petrm@...dia.com>,
	<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next 5/9] dcb: app: modify
 dcb_app_parse_mapping_cb for dcb-rewr reuse


Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com> writes:

> When parsing APP table entries, priority and protocol is assigned from
> value and key, respectively. Rewrite requires it opposite.
>
> Modify the existing dcb_app_parse_mapping_cb for dcb-rewr reuse, by
> using the newly introduced dcbnl attribute in the dcb_app_table struct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>
> ---
>  dcb/dcb_app.c | 11 +++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dcb/dcb_app.c b/dcb/dcb_app.c
> index 23d6bb2a0013..46af67112748 100644
> --- a/dcb/dcb_app.c
> +++ b/dcb/dcb_app.c
> @@ -232,10 +232,17 @@ void dcb_app_parse_mapping_cb(__u32 key, __u64 value, void *data)
>  	struct dcb_app_parse_mapping *pm = data;
>  	struct dcb_app app = {
>  		.selector = pm->selector,
> -		.priority = value,
> -		.protocol = key,
>  	};
>  
> +	if (pm->tab->attr == DCB_ATTR_IEEE_APP_TABLE) {
> +		app.priority = value;
> +		app.protocol = key;
> +
> +	} else {
> +		app.priority = key;
> +		app.protocol = value;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (pm->err)
>  		return;

? (Or thereabouts... again, not tested.)

modified   dcb/dcb_app.c
@@ -225,22 +225,40 @@ static void dcb_app_table_sort(struct dcb_app_table *tab)
 struct dcb_app_parse_mapping {
 	__u8 selector;
 	struct dcb_app_table *tab;
+	int (*push)(struct dcb_app_table *tab,
+		    __u8 selector, __u32 key, __u64 value);
 	int err;
 };
 
-static void dcb_app_parse_mapping_cb(__u32 key, __u64 value, void *data)
+static int dcb_app_push_app(struct dcb_app_table *tab,
+			    __u8 selector, __u32 key, __u64 value)
 {
-	struct dcb_app_parse_mapping *pm = data;
 	struct dcb_app app = {
-		.selector = pm->selector,
+		.selector = selector,
 		.priority = value,
 		.protocol = key,
 	};
+	return dcb_app_table_push(tab, &app);
+}
+
+static int dcb_app_push_rewr(struct dcb_app_table *tab,
+			     __u8 selector, __u32 key, __u64 value)
+{
+	struct dcb_app app = {
+		.selector = selector,
+		.priority = key,
+		.protocol = value,
+	};
+	return dcb_app_table_push(tab, &app);
+}
+
+static void dcb_app_parse_mapping_cb(__u32 key, __u64 value, void *data)
+{
+	struct dcb_app_parse_mapping *pm = data;
 
 	if (pm->err)
 		return;
-
-	pm->err = dcb_app_table_push(pm->tab, &app);
+	pm->err = pm->push(pm->tab, pm->selector, key, value);
 }
 
 static int dcb_app_parse_mapping_ethtype_prio(__u32 key, char *value, void *data)
@@ -640,6 +658,7 @@ static int dcb_cmd_app_parse_add_del(struct dcb *dcb, const char *dev,
 {
 	struct dcb_app_parse_mapping pm = {
 		.tab = tab,
+		.push = dcb_app_push_app,
 	};
 	int ret;