lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 19:22:38 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
Cc: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
 <jbrouer@...hat.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 <brouer@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, John Fastabend
 <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] page_pool: fix inconsistency for
 page_pool_ring_[un]lock()

On Tue, 23 May 2023 10:13:14 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> On 2023/5/22 19:45, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> >> Thanks for spotting and fixing this! :-)  
> 
> It was spotted when implementing the below patch:)
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/168269857929.2191653.13267688321246766547.stgit@firesoul/#25325801
> 
> Do you still working on optimizing the page_pool destroy
> process? If not, do you mind if I carry it on based on
> that?

Not sure what you mean, this patch is a fix and the destroy
optimizations where targeted at net-next. Fix goes in first,
and then after the tree merge on Thu the work in net-next can 
progress.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ