[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZGw46hrpiqCVNeXS@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 20:54:18 -0700
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini" <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"glipus@...il.com" <glipus@...il.com>,
"maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com" <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
"vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev" <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
"gerhard@...leder-embedded.com" <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>,
"thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com" <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 2/5] net: Expose available time stamping
layers to user space.
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 01:21:44PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 22 May 2023 13:04:33 -0700 Richard Cochran wrote:
> > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 03:56:36AM +0000, Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini wrote:
> >
> > > A controller may only support one HW Timestamp (PHY/Port) and one MAC Timestamp
> > > (DMA Timestamp) for packet timestamp activity. If a PTP packet has used the HW Timestamp (PHY/Port),
> >
> > This is wrong.
> >
> > The time stamping setting is global, at the device level, not at the
> > socket. And that is not going to change. This series is about
> > selecting between MAC/PHY time stamping globally, at the device level.
>
> What constitutes a device?
Sorry, maybe I should have said "interface".
You cannot have one socket with MAC and another with DMA time stamps,
as the above post implies or wishes for.
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists