[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230523133019.ce19932f89585eb10d092896@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 13:30:19 +0800
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Ze Gao <zegao2021@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...a.com>, Alexei
Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Daniel
Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, John
Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Martin
KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Steven
Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kafai@...com, kpsingh@...omium.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...nel.org, songliubraving@...com, Ze Gao
<zegao@...cent.com>
Subject: Re:
On Mon, 22 May 2023 10:07:42 +0800
Ze Gao <zegao2021@...il.com> wrote:
> Oops, I missed that. Thanks for pointing that out, which I thought is
> conditional use of rcu_is_watching before.
>
> One last point, I think we should double check on this
> "fentry does not filter with !rcu_is_watching"
> as quoted from Yonghong and argue whether it needs
> the same check for fentry as well.
rcu_is_watching() comment says;
* if the current CPU is not in its idle loop or is in an interrupt or
* NMI handler, return true.
Thus it returns *fault* if the current CPU is in the idle loop and not
any interrupt(including NMI) context. This means if any tracable function
is called from idle loop, it can be !rcu_is_watching(). I meant, this is
'context' based check, thus fentry can not filter out that some commonly
used functions is called from that context but it can be detected.
Thank you,
>
> Regards,
> Ze
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists