| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1CAC04AB-977F-46FB-81D0-70F90456CC4F@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 09:04:44 +0800 From: Cambda Zhu <cambda@...ux.alibaba.com> To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, Dust Li <dust.li@...ux.alibaba.com>, Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>, Jack Yang <mingliang@...ux.alibaba.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Return user_mss for TCP_MAXSEG in CLOSE/LISTEN state > On May 23, 2023, at 21:45, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 16:01 +0800, Cambda Zhu wrote: >> This patch removes the tp->mss_cache check in getting TCP_MAXSEG of >> CLOSE/LISTEN sock. Checking if tp->mss_cache is zero is probably a bug, >> since tp->mss_cache is initialized with TCP_MSS_DEFAULT. Getting >> TCP_MAXSEG of sock in other state will still return tp->mss_cache. >> >> Signed-off-by: Cambda Zhu <cambda@...ux.alibaba.com> >> Reported-by: Jack Yang <mingliang@...ux.alibaba.com> > > Could you please re-submit including the Eric's tags? > > Thanks! > > Paolo Sorry for no Eric's tag. I don't know the 'Suggested-by' tag before, and I'll re-submit the patch. Should I add Eric's 'Reviewed-by' to the patch? Or this should be added by maintainer? Sorry for my ignorance again. :) Thanks, Cambda
Powered by blists - more mailing lists