[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZG4FmSKeQzp6yG7z@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 13:39:53 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@...rochip.com>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/5] net: dsa: microchip: improving error
handling for 8-bit register RMW operations
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 02:32:16PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> This patch refines the error handling mechanism for 8-bit register
> read-modify-write operations. In case of a failure, it now logs an error
> message detailing the problematic offset. This enhancement aids in
> debugging by providing more precise information when these operations
> encounter issues.
>
> Furthermore, the ksz_prmw8() function has been updated to return error
> values rather than void, enabling calling functions to appropriately
> respond to errors.
What happens when there is an error that affects the current and future
accesses? Does this PHY driver then begin to flood the kernel log?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists