[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d909989-5418-17ca-f161-67b4c05c6fb2@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 16:17:56 +0200
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
CC: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, Daniel Latypov
<dlatypov@...gle.com>, <storagedev@...rochip.com>,
<linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>, James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
"Guo Xuenan" <guoxuenan@...wei.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"Tony Nguyen" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
<linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Sagi
Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, Jesse Brandeburg
<jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Gwan-gyeong Mun" <gwan-gyeong.mun@...el.com>, Dave Chinner
<dchinner@...hat.com>, "Keith Busch" <kbusch@...nel.org>, HighPoint Linux
Team <linux@...hpoint-tech.com>, <megaraidlinux.pdl@...adcom.com>, Jens Axboe
<axboe@...nel.dk>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Shivasharan S <shivasharan.srikanteshwara@...adcom.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>, Sumit Saxena
<sumit.saxena@...adcom.com>, "Tales Aparecida" <tales.aparecida@...il.com>,
Don Brace <don.brace@...rochip.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] overflow: Add struct_size_t() helper
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 20:53:54 -0700
> On Mon, 22 May 2023 14:18:13 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ddp.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ddp.h
>> index 37eadb3d27a8..41acfe26df1c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ddp.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ddp.h
>> @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ struct ice_buf_hdr {
>>
>> #define ICE_MAX_ENTRIES_IN_BUF(hd_sz, ent_sz) \
>> ((ICE_PKG_BUF_SIZE - \
>> - struct_size((struct ice_buf_hdr *)0, section_entry, 1) - (hd_sz)) / \
>> + struct_size_t(struct ice_buf_hdr, section_entry, 1) - (hd_sz)) / \
>> (ent_sz))
>>
>> /* ice package section IDs */
>> @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ struct ice_label_section {
>> };
>>
>> #define ICE_MAX_LABELS_IN_BUF \
>> - ICE_MAX_ENTRIES_IN_BUF(struct_size((struct ice_label_section *)0, \
>> + ICE_MAX_ENTRIES_IN_BUF(struct_size_t(struct ice_label_section, \
>> label, 1) - \
>> sizeof(struct ice_label), \
>> sizeof(struct ice_label))
>> @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ struct ice_boost_tcam_section {
>> };
>>
>> #define ICE_MAX_BST_TCAMS_IN_BUF \
>> - ICE_MAX_ENTRIES_IN_BUF(struct_size((struct ice_boost_tcam_section *)0, \
>> + ICE_MAX_ENTRIES_IN_BUF(struct_size_t(struct ice_boost_tcam_section, \
>> tcam, 1) - \
>> sizeof(struct ice_boost_tcam_entry), \
>> sizeof(struct ice_boost_tcam_entry))
>> @@ -372,8 +372,7 @@ struct ice_marker_ptype_tcam_section {
>> };
>>
>> #define ICE_MAX_MARKER_PTYPE_TCAMS_IN_BUF \
>> - ICE_MAX_ENTRIES_IN_BUF( \
>> - struct_size((struct ice_marker_ptype_tcam_section *)0, tcam, \
>> + ICE_MAX_ENTRIES_IN_BUF(struct_size_t(struct ice_marker_ptype_tcam_section, tcam, \
>> 1) - \
>> sizeof(struct ice_marker_ptype_tcam_entry), \
>> sizeof(struct ice_marker_ptype_tcam_entry))
>
> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
>
> but Intel ICE folks please speak up if this has a high chance of
> conflicts, I think I've seen some ICE DDP patches flying around :(
I haven't found anything that would conflict with this, esp. since it
implies no functional changes.
I agree it's been much needed, great, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Olek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists