[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOWid-dYtkcKuNxoOyf3yqSJ7OtcNjaqJLVX1QhRUhYSOO6vHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 14:01:17 -0400
From: Kenny Ho <y2kenny@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>, Kenny Ho <Kenny.Ho@....com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove hardcoded static string length
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 1:43 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> The other end of the socket should not blow up, because that would be
> an obvious DOS or buffer overwrite attack vector. So you need to
> decide, do you want to expose such issues and see if anything does
> actually blow up, or do you want to do a bit more work and correctly
> terminate the string when capped?
Right... I guess it's not clear to me that existing implementations
null-terminate correctly when UTS_RELEASE causes the string to exceed
the 65 byte size of rxrpc_version_string. We can of course do better,
but I hesitate to do strncpy because I am not familiar with this code
base enough to tell if this function is part of some hot path where
strncpy matters.
Regards,
Kenny
Powered by blists - more mailing lists