| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <351cbfcc-a3be-ff23-ead7-5fc38013ecbb@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 16:20:15 -0500
From: Judith Mendez <jm@...com>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
CC: Chandrasekar Ramakrishnan <rcsekar@...sung.com>,
<linux-can@...r.kernel.org>, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
"David
S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub
Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Schuyler Patton
<spatton@...com>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
<robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
Tony
Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] can: m_can: Add hrtimer to generate software
interrupt
Hello Marc,
On 5/23/23 1:35 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 22.05.2023 21:37:49, Judith Mendez wrote:
>> Add an hrtimer to MCAN class device. Each MCAN will have its own
>> hrtimer instantiated if there is no hardware interrupt found in
>> device tree M_CAN node.
>
> Please add a sentence why you introduce polling mode, i.e. there are
> SoCs where the M_CAN interrupt is not available on the CPUs (which are
> running Linux).
Sure, I can do that, thanks.
>
>> The hrtimer will generate a software interrupt every 1 ms. In
>> hrtimer callback, we check if there is a transaction pending by
>> reading a register, then process by calling the isr if there is.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@...com>
>> ---
>> Changelog:
>> v7:
>> - Clean up m_can_platform.c if/else section after removing poll-interval
>> - Remove poll-interval from patch description
>> v6:
>> - Move hrtimer stop/start function calls to m_can_open and m_can_close to
>> support power suspend/resume
>> v5:
>> - Change dev_dbg to dev_info if hardware interrupt exists and polling
>> is enabled
>> v4:
>> - No changes
>> v3:
>> - Create a define for 1 ms polling interval
>> - Change plarform_get_irq to optional to not print error msg
>> v2:
>> - Add functionality to check for 'poll-interval' property in MCAN node
>> - Add 'polling' flag in driver to check if device is using polling method
>> - Check for timer polling and hardware interrupt cases, default to
>> hardware interrupt method
>> - Change ns_to_ktime() to ms_to_ktime()
>> ---
>> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.h | 4 ++++
>> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_platform.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---
>> 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
>> index a5003435802b..f273d989bdff 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>> #include <linux/bitfield.h>
>> #include <linux/can/dev.h>
>> #include <linux/ethtool.h>
>> +#include <linux/hrtimer.h>
>> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> #include <linux/io.h>
>> #include <linux/iopoll.h>
>> @@ -308,6 +309,9 @@ enum m_can_reg {
>> #define TX_EVENT_MM_MASK GENMASK(31, 24)
>> #define TX_EVENT_TXTS_MASK GENMASK(15, 0)
>>
>> +/* Hrtimer polling interval */
>> +#define HRTIMER_POLL_INTERVAL 1
>> +
>> /* The ID and DLC registers are adjacent in M_CAN FIFO memory,
>> * and we can save a (potentially slow) bus round trip by combining
>> * reads and writes to them.
>> @@ -895,7 +899,7 @@ static int m_can_handle_bus_errors(struct net_device *dev, u32 irqstatus,
>> netdev_dbg(dev, "Arbitration phase error detected\n");
>> work_done += m_can_handle_lec_err(dev, lec);
>> }
>> -
>> +
>
> Unrelated change. I've send a separate patch to fix the problem.
Sorry about this, this was not intentional.
>
>> if (is_lec_err(dlec)) {
>> netdev_dbg(dev, "Data phase error detected\n");
>> work_done += m_can_handle_lec_err(dev, dlec);
>> @@ -1414,6 +1418,12 @@ static int m_can_start(struct net_device *dev)
>>
>> m_can_enable_all_interrupts(cdev);
>>
>> + if (cdev->polling) {
>> + dev_dbg(cdev->dev, "Start hrtimer\n");
>> + hrtimer_start(&cdev->hrtimer, ms_to_ktime(HRTIMER_POLL_INTERVAL),
>> + HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED);
>> + }
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1571,6 +1581,11 @@ static void m_can_stop(struct net_device *dev)
>> /* disable all interrupts */
>> m_can_disable_all_interrupts(cdev);
>>
>> + if (cdev->polling) {
>> + dev_dbg(cdev->dev, "Disabling the hrtimer\n");
>> + hrtimer_cancel(&cdev->hrtimer);
>> + }
>> +
>
> This might be a racy. Please move the disabling of the hrtimer before
> disabling all interrupts. This makes it also symmetric with respect to
> m_can_start().
This makes sense.
>
>> /* Set init mode to disengage from the network */
>> m_can_config_endisable(cdev, true);
>>
>> @@ -1793,6 +1808,18 @@ static netdev_tx_t m_can_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
>> return NETDEV_TX_OK;
>> }
>>
>> +static enum hrtimer_restart hrtimer_callback(struct hrtimer *timer)
>> +{
>> + struct m_can_classdev *cdev = container_of(timer, struct
>> + m_can_classdev, hrtimer);
>> +
>> + m_can_isr(0, cdev->net);
>> +
>> + hrtimer_forward_now(timer, ms_to_ktime(HRTIMER_POLL_INTERVAL));
>> +
>> + return HRTIMER_RESTART;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int m_can_open(struct net_device *dev)
>> {
>> struct m_can_classdev *cdev = netdev_priv(dev);
>> @@ -1831,9 +1858,11 @@ static int m_can_open(struct net_device *dev)
>> err = request_threaded_irq(dev->irq, NULL, m_can_isr,
>> IRQF_ONESHOT,
>> dev->name, dev);
>> - } else {
>> + } else if (!cdev->polling) {
>> err = request_irq(dev->irq, m_can_isr, IRQF_SHARED, dev->name,
>> dev);
>> + } else {
>> + cdev->hrtimer.function = &hrtimer_callback;
>
> I think you can move this assignment to m_can_class_register(). We only
> need to set the function once.
Great idea!
>
>> }
>>
>> if (err < 0) {
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.h b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.h
>> index a839dc71dc9b..e9db5cce4e68 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.h
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>> #include <linux/device.h>
>> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>> #include <linux/freezer.h>
>> +#include <linux/hrtimer.h>
>> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> #include <linux/io.h>
>> #include <linux/iopoll.h>
>> @@ -93,6 +94,9 @@ struct m_can_classdev {
>> int is_peripheral;
>>
>> struct mram_cfg mcfg[MRAM_CFG_NUM];
>> +
>> + struct hrtimer hrtimer;
>> + bool polling;
>> };
>>
>> struct m_can_classdev *m_can_class_allocate_dev(struct device *dev, int sizeof_priv);
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_platform.c b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_platform.c
>> index 94dc82644113..b639c9e645d3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_platform.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_platform.c
>> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>> //
>> // Copyright (C) 2018-19 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/
>>
>> +#include <linux/hrtimer.h>
>> #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>
>> @@ -96,12 +97,30 @@ static int m_can_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> goto probe_fail;
>>
>> addr = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "m_can");
>> - irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "int0");
>
> I think irq will be uninitialized after this change. Although the
> compiler doesn't complain :(
Agreed, I did notice this when testing. But is it an issue?
>
> BTW: I think we don't need the "polling" variable in the priv. We can
> make use of "irq". "irq" being 0 means use polling.
True, but is using the polling flag easier for the user to read?
>
>> - if (IS_ERR(addr) || irq < 0) {
>> - ret = -EINVAL;
>> + if (IS_ERR(addr)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(addr);
>> goto probe_fail;
>> }
>>
>> + if (device_property_present(mcan_class->dev, "interrupts") ||
>> + device_property_present(mcan_class->dev, "interrupt-names")) {
>> + irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "int0");
>> + mcan_class->polling = false;
>> + if (irq == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>> + ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> + goto probe_fail;
>> + }
>> + if (irq < 0) {
>> + ret = -ENXIO;
EINVAL? Wouldn't ENXIO (No such device or address) be more appropriate than
invalid argument?
>
> Please return the original error code.
>
>> + goto probe_fail;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + mcan_class->polling = true;
>> + dev_dbg(mcan_class->dev, "Polling enabled, initialize hrtimer");
>> + hrtimer_init(&mcan_class->hrtimer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC,
>> + HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED);
>> + }
>> +
>> /* message ram could be shared */
>> res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "message_ram");
>> if (!res) {
~Judith
Powered by blists - more mailing lists