lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230524-fountain-icing-eceec8fe6c96@spud>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 22:54:19 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Justin Chen <justin.chen@...adcom.com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, justinpopo6@...il.com,
	f.fainelli@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, opendmb@...il.com,
	andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
	richardcochran@...il.com, sumit.semwal@...aro.org,
	christian.koenig@....com, simon.horman@...igine.com,
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/6] dt-bindings: net: Brcm ASP 2.0 Ethernet
 controller

On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 02:47:59PM -0700, Justin Chen wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 11:56 PM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com> wrote:

> Gotcha. I got something like this now.
> 
>   compatible:
>     oneOf:
>       - items:
>           - enum:
>               - brcm,bcm74165-asp
>           - const: brcm,asp-v2.1
>       - items:
>           - enum:
>               - brcm,bcm72165-asp
>           - const: brcm,asp-v2.0

Yes, this is what I had in mind.

> Apologies, still getting used to this yaml stuff. Starting to make a
> bit more sense to me now.

No worries.

> > > valid fallback for "brcm,asp-v2.1"?
> > > The oneOf: also becomes redundant since you only have one items:.
> > >
> > > > Will submit a v5 tomorrow.
> > >
> > > BTW, when you do, could you use the address listed in MAINTAINERS rather
> > > than the one you used for this version?
> > >
> I changed the address listed in MAINTAINERS from the previous versions
> of this patchset. The current version should match the address that
> this patch set was sent from. Looks like I forgot to add a changelog
> for that in v4.

Hmm, I must not have been clear. You sent it to <conor@...nel.org> and I
was hoping that you would use <conor+dt@...nel.org> instead so that you
end up hitting the right mail filters :) It's not a problem, I was just
added to it in -rc1 so get_maintainer.pl probably didn't spit my name
out for your original revision.

Thanks,
Conor.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ