lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZG25QxZ3hP5JCuqx@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 08:14:11 +0100 From: Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@...il.com> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, corbet@....net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] docs: netdev: document the existence of the mail bot On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 07:05:15PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 23 May 2023 03:46:46 +0200 Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > +Instead of delegating patchwork permissions netdev uses a simple mail > > > +bot which looks for special commands/lines within the emails sent to > > > +the mailing list. For example to mark a series as Changes Requested > > > +one needs to send the following line anywhere in the email thread:: > > > + > > > + pw-bot: changes-requested > > > > ... > > > > > + https://patchwork.hopto.org/pw-bot.html > > > > [Evil grin] > > So your patch did not trigger the bot. Lets see if my reply does? > > [/Evil grin] > > Commands must be on separate lines, with no extra white space. > I wonder if that proves the documentation is insufficient :) I did wonder if the space before pw-bot was mandatory as well, but apparently not. Good improvement, thanks for documenting this. Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists