| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CACGkMEvm=MJz5e2C_7U=yjrvoo7pxsr=tRAL29OdxJDWhvtiSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 11:43:34 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alvaro.karsz@...id-run.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 net-next 1/2] virtio-net: convert rx mode setting to
use workqueue
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 5:15 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 04:18:41PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > This patch convert rx mode setting to be done in a workqueue, this is
> > a must for allow to sleep when waiting for the cvq command to
> > response since current code is executed under addr spin lock.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > Changes since V1:
> > - use RTNL to synchronize rx mode worker
> > ---
> > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > index 56ca1d270304..5d2f1da4eaa0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -265,6 +265,12 @@ struct virtnet_info {
> > /* Work struct for config space updates */
> > struct work_struct config_work;
> >
> > + /* Work struct for config rx mode */
>
> With a bit less abbreviation maybe? setting rx mode?
That's fine.
>
> > + struct work_struct rx_mode_work;
> > +
> > + /* Is rx mode work enabled? */
>
> Ugh not a great comment.
Any suggestions for this. E.g we had:
/* Is delayed refill enabled? */
>
> > + bool rx_mode_work_enabled;
> > +
>
>
>
> > /* Does the affinity hint is set for virtqueues? */
> > bool affinity_hint_set;
> >
> > @@ -388,6 +394,20 @@ static void disable_delayed_refill(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> > spin_unlock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
> > }
> >
> > +static void enable_rx_mode_work(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> > +{
> > + rtnl_lock();
> > + vi->rx_mode_work_enabled = true;
> > + rtnl_unlock();
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void disable_rx_mode_work(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> > +{
> > + rtnl_lock();
> > + vi->rx_mode_work_enabled = false;
> > + rtnl_unlock();
> > +}
> > +
> > static void virtqueue_napi_schedule(struct napi_struct *napi,
> > struct virtqueue *vq)
> > {
> > @@ -2341,9 +2361,11 @@ static int virtnet_close(struct net_device *dev)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static void virtnet_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev)
> > +static void virtnet_rx_mode_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > {
> > - struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> > + struct virtnet_info *vi =
> > + container_of(work, struct virtnet_info, rx_mode_work);
> > + struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
> > struct scatterlist sg[2];
> > struct virtio_net_ctrl_mac *mac_data;
> > struct netdev_hw_addr *ha;
> > @@ -2356,6 +2378,8 @@ static void virtnet_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev)
> > if (!virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_RX))
> > return;
> >
> > + rtnl_lock();
> > +
> > vi->ctrl->promisc = ((dev->flags & IFF_PROMISC) != 0);
> > vi->ctrl->allmulti = ((dev->flags & IFF_ALLMULTI) != 0);
> >
> > @@ -2373,14 +2397,19 @@ static void virtnet_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev)
> > dev_warn(&dev->dev, "Failed to %sable allmulti mode.\n",
> > vi->ctrl->allmulti ? "en" : "dis");
> >
> > + netif_addr_lock_bh(dev);
> > +
> > uc_count = netdev_uc_count(dev);
> > mc_count = netdev_mc_count(dev);
> > /* MAC filter - use one buffer for both lists */
> > buf = kzalloc(((uc_count + mc_count) * ETH_ALEN) +
> > (2 * sizeof(mac_data->entries)), GFP_ATOMIC);
> > mac_data = buf;
> > - if (!buf)
> > + if (!buf) {
> > + netif_addr_unlock_bh(dev);
> > + rtnl_unlock();
> > return;
> > + }
> >
> > sg_init_table(sg, 2);
> >
> > @@ -2401,6 +2430,8 @@ static void virtnet_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev)
> > netdev_for_each_mc_addr(ha, dev)
> > memcpy(&mac_data->macs[i++][0], ha->addr, ETH_ALEN);
> >
> > + netif_addr_unlock_bh(dev);
> > +
> > sg_set_buf(&sg[1], mac_data,
> > sizeof(mac_data->entries) + (mc_count * ETH_ALEN));
> >
> > @@ -2408,9 +2439,19 @@ static void virtnet_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev)
> > VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC_TABLE_SET, sg))
> > dev_warn(&dev->dev, "Failed to set MAC filter table.\n");
> >
> > + rtnl_unlock();
> > +
> > kfree(buf);
> > }
> >
> > +static void virtnet_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> > +
> > + if (vi->rx_mode_work_enabled)
> > + schedule_work(&vi->rx_mode_work);
> > +}
> > +
>
> > static int virtnet_vlan_rx_add_vid(struct net_device *dev,
> > __be16 proto, u16 vid)
> > {
> > @@ -3181,6 +3222,8 @@ static void virtnet_freeze_down(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> >
> > /* Make sure no work handler is accessing the device */
> > flush_work(&vi->config_work);
> > + disable_rx_mode_work(vi);
> > + flush_work(&vi->rx_mode_work);
> >
> > netif_tx_lock_bh(vi->dev);
> > netif_device_detach(vi->dev);
>
> Hmm so queued rx mode work will just get skipped
> and on restore we get a wrong rx mode.
> Any way to make this more robust?
It could be done by scheduling a work on restore.
Thanks
>
>
> > @@ -3203,6 +3246,7 @@ static int virtnet_restore_up(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > virtio_device_ready(vdev);
> >
> > enable_delayed_refill(vi);
> > + enable_rx_mode_work(vi);
> >
> > if (netif_running(vi->dev)) {
> > err = virtnet_open(vi->dev);
> > @@ -4002,6 +4046,7 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > vdev->priv = vi;
> >
> > INIT_WORK(&vi->config_work, virtnet_config_changed_work);
> > + INIT_WORK(&vi->rx_mode_work, virtnet_rx_mode_work);
> > spin_lock_init(&vi->refill_lock);
> >
> > if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF)) {
> > @@ -4110,6 +4155,8 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > if (vi->has_rss || vi->has_rss_hash_report)
> > virtnet_init_default_rss(vi);
> >
> > + enable_rx_mode_work(vi);
> > +
> > /* serialize netdev register + virtio_device_ready() with ndo_open() */
> > rtnl_lock();
> >
> > @@ -4207,6 +4254,8 @@ static void virtnet_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> >
> > /* Make sure no work handler is accessing the device. */
> > flush_work(&vi->config_work);
> > + disable_rx_mode_work(vi);
> > + flush_work(&vi->rx_mode_work);
> >
> > unregister_netdev(vi->dev);
> >
> > --
> > 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists