lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20230525184105.1909399-30-sashal@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 14:41:01 -0400 From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 30/31] atm: hide unused procfs functions From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> [ Upstream commit fb1b7be9b16c1f4626969ba4e95a97da2a452b41 ] When CONFIG_PROC_FS is disabled, the function declarations for some procfs functions are hidden, but the definitions are still build, as shown by this compiler warning: net/atm/resources.c:403:7: error: no previous prototype for 'atm_dev_seq_start' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] net/atm/resources.c:409:6: error: no previous prototype for 'atm_dev_seq_stop' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] net/atm/resources.c:414:7: error: no previous prototype for 'atm_dev_seq_next' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] Add another #ifdef to leave these out of the build. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230516194625.549249-2-arnd@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> --- net/atm/resources.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/atm/resources.c b/net/atm/resources.c index 53236986dfe09..3ad39ae971323 100644 --- a/net/atm/resources.c +++ b/net/atm/resources.c @@ -403,6 +403,7 @@ int atm_dev_ioctl(unsigned int cmd, void __user *buf, int __user *sioc_len, return error; } +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS void *atm_dev_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos) { mutex_lock(&atm_dev_mutex); @@ -418,3 +419,4 @@ void *atm_dev_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos) { return seq_list_next(v, &atm_devs, pos); } +#endif -- 2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists