netdev - Re: [PATCH] Truncate UTS_RELEASE for rxrpc version

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 23:52:12 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Kenny Ho <y2kenny@...il.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Kenny Ho <Kenny.Ho@....com>,
    David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
    Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
    Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
    "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
    Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
    "linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org>,
    "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
    "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
    alexander.deucher@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Truncate UTS_RELEASE for rxrpc version

Kenny Ho <y2kenny@...il.com> wrote:

> This makes sense and looks fine to me.  I don't know the proper
> etiquette here, but
> Acked-by: Kenny Ho <Kenny.Ho@....com>

If I'm not going to pick the patch up, I tend to use Acked-by when reviewing a
patch that touches code I'm a listed maintainer for and Reviewed-by when it's
code that I'm not a maintainer for...  but the descriptions in:

	Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst

seem to leave a lot of overlap.

David