netdev - Re: x86 copy performance regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wibWdTp-kdCKc-F3d4aVcHO40qqoxoATG+KhVivYE0TqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 13:37:15 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86 copy performance regression

On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 11:33 AM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Anyway, I guess *this* avoids all issues. It creates an extra jump to
> a jump for the case where the CPU doesn't have ERMS, but I guess we
> don't really care about those CPUs anyway.

Well, I'm obviously wrong, because my very own CPU (AMD Zen 2) doesn't do ERMS.

But the extra 'jmp' doesn't seem to appreciably matter, so I guess I
don't care. It does show up in profiles, but only barely.

I've committed and pushed out the fix.

               Linus