lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZHBwLBnKacQCG2/U@corigine.com> Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 10:39:08 +0200 From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com> To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alexis.lothore@...tlin.com, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/4] net: ethernet: altera-tse: Convert to mdio-regmap and use PCS Lynx On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 09:42:50AM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote: > The newly introduced regmap-based MDIO driver allows for an easy mapping > of an mdiodevice onto the memory-mapped TSE PCS, which is actually a > Lynx PCS. > > Convert Altera TSE to use this PCS instead of the pcs-altera-tse, which > is nothing more than a memory-mapped Lynx PCS. > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com> Hi Maxime, I have some concerns about the error paths in this patch. ... > @@ -1134,13 +1136,21 @@ static int altera_tse_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > const struct of_device_id *of_id = NULL; > struct altera_tse_private *priv; > struct resource *control_port; > + struct regmap *pcs_regmap; > struct resource *dma_res; > struct resource *pcs_res; > + struct mii_bus *pcs_bus; > struct net_device *ndev; > void __iomem *descmap; > - int pcs_reg_width = 2; > int ret = -ENODEV; > > + struct regmap_config pcs_regmap_cfg; nit: this probably belongs in with the bunch of declarations above it. > + > + struct mdio_regmap_config mrc = { > + .parent = &pdev->dev, > + .valid_addr = 0x0, > + }; nit: maybe this too. > + > ndev = alloc_etherdev(sizeof(struct altera_tse_private)); > if (!ndev) { > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not allocate network device\n"); > @@ -1258,10 +1268,29 @@ static int altera_tse_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > ret = request_and_map(pdev, "pcs", &pcs_res, > &priv->pcs_base); > if (ret) { > + /* If we can't find a dedicated resource for the PCS, fallback > + * to the internal PCS, that has a different address stride > + */ > priv->pcs_base = priv->mac_dev + tse_csroffs(mdio_phy0); > - pcs_reg_width = 4; > + pcs_regmap_cfg.reg_bits = 32; > + /* Values are MDIO-like values, on 16 bits */ > + pcs_regmap_cfg.val_bits = 16; > + pcs_regmap_cfg.reg_shift = REGMAP_UPSHIFT(2); > + } else { > + pcs_regmap_cfg.reg_bits = 16; > + pcs_regmap_cfg.val_bits = 16; > + pcs_regmap_cfg.reg_shift = REGMAP_UPSHIFT(1); > } > > + /* Create a regmap for the PCS so that it can be used by the PCS driver */ > + pcs_regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio(&pdev->dev, priv->pcs_base, > + &pcs_regmap_cfg); > + if (IS_ERR(pcs_regmap)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(pcs_regmap); > + goto err_free_netdev; > + } > + mrc.regmap = pcs_regmap; > + > /* Rx IRQ */ > priv->rx_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "rx_irq"); > if (priv->rx_irq == -ENXIO) { > @@ -1384,7 +1413,20 @@ static int altera_tse_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > (unsigned long) control_port->start, priv->rx_irq, > priv->tx_irq); > > - priv->pcs = alt_tse_pcs_create(ndev, priv->pcs_base, pcs_reg_width); > + snprintf(mrc.name, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "%s-pcs-mii", ndev->name); > + pcs_bus = devm_mdio_regmap_register(&pdev->dev, &mrc); > + if (IS_ERR(pcs_bus)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(pcs_bus); > + goto err_init_phy; > + } > + > + priv->pcs_mdiodev = mdio_device_create(pcs_bus, 0); mdio_device_create() can fail. Should that be handled here? > + > + priv->pcs = lynx_pcs_create(priv->pcs_mdiodev); > + if (!priv->pcs) { > + ret = -ENODEV; > + goto err_init_phy; Does this leak priv->pcs_mdiodev? > + } > > priv->phylink_config.dev = &ndev->dev; > priv->phylink_config.type = PHYLINK_NETDEV; > @@ -1407,11 +1449,12 @@ static int altera_tse_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (IS_ERR(priv->phylink)) { > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to create phylink\n"); > ret = PTR_ERR(priv->phylink); > - goto err_init_phy; > + goto err_pcs; Does this leak priv->pcs ? > } > > return 0; > - > +err_pcs: > + mdio_device_free(priv->pcs_mdiodev); > err_init_phy: > unregister_netdev(ndev); > err_register_netdev: > @@ -1433,6 +1476,8 @@ static int altera_tse_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > altera_tse_mdio_destroy(ndev); > unregister_netdev(ndev); > phylink_destroy(priv->phylink); > + mdio_device_free(priv->pcs_mdiodev); > + > free_netdev(ndev); > > return 0; > diff --git a/include/linux/mdio/mdio-regmap.h b/include/linux/mdio/mdio-regmap.h > index b8508f152552..679d9069846b 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mdio/mdio-regmap.h > +++ b/include/linux/mdio/mdio-regmap.h > @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ > #ifndef MDIO_REGMAP_H > #define MDIO_REGMAP_H > > +#include <linux/phy.h> > + > struct device; > struct regmap; > This hunk doesn't seem strictly related to the patch. Perhaps the include belongs elsewhere. Or the hunk belongs in another patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists