[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZHHC6OGH9NJZgRfA@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2023 11:44:24 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, jsd@...ihalf.com,
Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com, andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, mengyuanlou@...-swift.com,
Piotr Raczynski <piotr.raczynski@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 1/9] net: txgbe: Add software nodes to
support phylink
+Cc Hans (see below)
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 05:17:14PM +0800, Jiawen Wu wrote:
> Register software nodes for GPIO, I2C, SFP and PHYLINK. Define the
> device properties.
...
> +int txgbe_init_phy(struct txgbe *txgbe)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = txgbe_swnodes_register(txgbe);
> + if (ret) {
> + wx_err(txgbe->wx, "failed to register software nodes\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
These 4 lines can be as simple as
return ret;
> +}
...
> +#define NODE_PROP(_NAME, _PROP) \
> + (const struct software_node) { \
> + .name = _NAME, \
> + .properties = _PROP, \
> + }
Looking at the amount of drivers that want this, I would declare it in the
property.h with SOFTWARE_NODE_PROPERTY name. I'll Ack that.
Hans, what do you think?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists