netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] net-next: mvpp2: relax return value check for IRQ get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230528201407.394235f5@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 20:14:07 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Cc: andy.shevchenko@...il.com, Matti Vaittinen
 <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>, Andy Shevchenko
 <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
 Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>, Sakari Ailus
 <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
 <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
 Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
 Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, Andreas Klinger
 <ak@...klinger.de>, Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>, Russell King
 <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo
 Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jonathan Neuschäfer
 <j.neuschaefer@....net>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Paul
 Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>, Akhil R <akhilrajeev@...dia.com>,
 linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org,
 linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] net-next: mvpp2: relax return value check for
 IRQ get

On Mon, 22 May 2023 08:15:01 +0300
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com> wrote:

> Hi Andy,
> 
> On 5/21/23 20:19, andy.shevchenko@...il.com wrote:
> > Fri, May 19, 2023 at 02:01:47PM +0300, Matti Vaittinen kirjoitti:  
> >> fwnode_irq_get[_byname]() were changed to not return 0 anymore.
> >>
> >> Drop check for return value 0.  
> > 
> > ...
> >   
> >> -		if (v->irq <= 0) {
> >> +		if (v->irq < 0) {
> >>   			ret = -EINVAL;  
> > 
> > 			ret = v->irq;
> > 
> > ?  
> 
> For me that seems to be correct, yes. This, however, would be a 
> functional change and in my opinion it should be done separately from 
> this API change.
Ah. I commented on this as well in v6.  Roll us that separate patch
and I expect we'll both be happy ;)

Jonathan

> 
> >   
> >>   			goto err;
> >>   		}  
> >   
>