[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230529155024.222213-16-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 17:50:17 +0200
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org,
ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
magnus.karlsson@...el.com,
bjorn@...nel.org,
tirthendu.sarkar@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 15/22] xsk: add multi-buffer documentation
From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
Add AF_XDP multi-buffer support documentation including two
pseudo-code samples.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
---
Documentation/networking/af_xdp.rst | 177 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 177 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/af_xdp.rst b/Documentation/networking/af_xdp.rst
index 247c6c4127e9..2b583f58967b 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/af_xdp.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/af_xdp.rst
@@ -453,6 +453,93 @@ XDP_OPTIONS getsockopt
Gets options from an XDP socket. The only one supported so far is
XDP_OPTIONS_ZEROCOPY which tells you if zero-copy is on or not.
+Multi-Buffer Support
+--------------------
+
+With multi-buffer support, programs using AF_XDP sockets can receive
+and transmit packets consisting of multiple buffers both in copy and
+zero-copy mode. For example, a packet can consist of two
+frames/buffers, one with the header and the other one with the data,
+or a 9K Ethernet jumbo frame can be constructed by chaining together
+three 4K frames.
+
+Some definitions:
+
+* A packet consists of one or more frames
+
+* A descriptor in one of the AF_XDP rings always refers to a single
+ frame. In the case the packet consists of a single frame, the
+ descriptor refers to the whole packet.
+
+To enable multi-buffer support for an AF_XDP socket, use the new bind
+flag XDP_USE_SG. If this is not provided, all multi-buffer packets
+will be dropped just as before. Note that the XDP program loaded also
+needs to be in multi-buffer mode. This can be accomplished by using
+"xdp.frags" as the section name of the XDP program used.
+
+To represent a packet consisting of multiple frames, a new flag called
+XDP_PKT_CONTD is introduced in the options field of the Rx and Tx
+descriptors. If it is true (1) the packet continues with the next
+descriptor and if it is false (0) it means this is the last descriptor
+of the packet. Why the reverse logic of end-of-packet (eop) flag found
+in many NICs? Just to preserve compatibility with non-multi-buffer
+applications that have this bit set to false for all packets on Rx,
+and the apps set the options field to zero for Tx, as anything else
+will be treated as an invalid descriptor.
+
+These are the semantics for producing packets onto AF_XDP Tx ring
+consisting of multiple frames:
+
+* When an invalid descriptor is found, all the other
+ descriptors/frames of this packet are marked as invalid and not
+ completed. The next descriptor is treated as the start of a new
+ packet, even if this was not the intent (because we cannot guess
+ the intent). As before, if your program is producing invalid
+ descriptors you have a bug that must be fixed.
+
+* Zero length descriptors are treated as invalid descriptors.
+
+* For copy mode, the maximum supported number of frames in a packet is
+ equal to CONFIG_MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1. If it is exceeded, all
+ descriptors accumulated so far are dropped and treated as
+ invalid. To produce an application that will work on any system
+ regardless of this config setting, limit the number of frags to 18,
+ as the minimum value of the config is 17.
+
+* For zero-copy mode, the limit is up to what the NIC HW
+ supports. Usually at least five on the NICs we have checked. We
+ consciously chose to not enforce a rigid limit (such as
+ CONFIG_MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1) for zero-copy mode, as it would have
+ resulted in copy actions under the hood to fit into what limit
+ the NIC supports. Kind of defeats the purpose of zero-copy mode.
+
+* The ZC batch API guarantees that it will provide a batch of Tx
+ descriptors that ends with full packet at the end. If not, ZC
+ drivers would have to gather the full packet on their side. The
+ approach we picked makes ZC drivers' life much easier (at least on
+ Tx side).
+
+On the Rx path in copy-mode, the xsk core copies the XDP data into
+multiple descriptors, if needed, and sets the XDP_PKT_CONTD flag as
+detailed before. Zero-copy mode works the same, though the data is not
+copied. When the application gets a descriptor with the XDP_PKT_CONTD
+flag set to one, it means that the packet consists of multiple buffers
+and it continues with the next buffer in the following
+descriptor. When a descriptor with XDP_PKT_CONTD == 0 is received, it
+means that this is the last buffer of the packet. AF_XDP guarantees
+that only a complete packet (all frames in the packet) is sent to the
+application.
+
+If application reads a batch of descriptors, using for example the libxdp
+interfaces, it is not guaranteed that the batch will end with a full
+packet. It might end in the middle of a packet and the rest of the
+buffers of that packet will arrive at the beginning of the next batch,
+since the libxdp interface does not read the whole ring (unless you
+have an enormous batch size or a very small ring size).
+
+An example program each for Rx and Tx multi-buffer support can be found
+later in this document.
+
Usage
=====
@@ -532,6 +619,96 @@ like this:
But please use the libbpf functions as they are optimized and ready to
use. Will make your life easier.
+Usage Multi-Buffer Rx
+=====================
+
+Here is a simple Rx path pseudo-code example (using libxdp interfaces
+for simplicity). Error paths have been excluded to keep it short:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ void rx_packets(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk)
+ {
+ static bool new_packet = true;
+ u32 idx_rx = 0, idx_fq = 0;
+ static char *pkt;
+
+ int rcvd = xsk_ring_cons__peek(&xsk->rx, opt_batch_size, &idx_rx);
+
+ xsk_ring_prod__reserve(&xsk->umem->fq, rcvd, &idx_fq);
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < rcvd; i++) {
+ struct xdp_desc *desc = xsk_ring_cons__rx_desc(&xsk->rx, idx_rx++);
+ char *frag = xsk_umem__get_data(xsk->umem->buffer, desc->addr);
+ bool eop = !(desc->options & XDP_PKT_CONTD);
+
+ if (new_packet)
+ pkt = frag;
+ else
+ add_frag_to_pkt(pkt, frag);
+
+ if (eop)
+ process_pkt(pkt);
+
+ new_packet = eop;
+
+ *xsk_ring_prod__fill_addr(&xsk->umem->fq, idx_fq++) = desc->addr;
+ }
+
+ xsk_ring_prod__submit(&xsk->umem->fq, rcvd);
+ xsk_ring_cons__release(&xsk->rx, rcvd);
+ }
+
+Usage Multi-Buffer Tx
+=====================
+
+Here is an example Tx path pseudo-code (using libxdp interfaces for
+simplicity) ignoring that the umem is finite in size, and that we
+eventually will run out of packets to send. Also assumes pkts.addr
+points to a valid location in the umem.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ void tx_packets(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk, struct pkt *pkts,
+ int batch_size)
+ {
+ u32 idx, i, pkt_nb = 0;
+
+ xsk_ring_prod__reserve(&xsk->tx, batch_size, &idx);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < batch_size;) {
+ u64 addr = pkts[pkt_nb].addr;
+ u32 len = pkts[pkt_nb].size;
+
+ do {
+ struct xdp_desc *tx_desc;
+
+ tx_desc = xsk_ring_prod__tx_desc(&xsk->tx, idx + i++);
+ tx_desc->addr = addr;
+
+ if (len > xsk_frame_size) {
+ tx_desc->len = xsk_frame_size;
+ tx_desc->options = XDP_PKT_CONTD;
+ } else {
+ tx_desc->len = len;
+ tx_desc->options = 0;
+ pkt_nb++;
+ }
+ len -= tx_desc->len;
+ addr += xsk_frame_size;
+
+ if (i == batch_size) {
+ /* Remember len, addr, pkt_nb for next iteration.
+ * Skipped for simplicity.
+ */
+ break;
+ }
+ } while (len);
+ }
+
+ xsk_ring_prod__submit(&xsk->tx, i);
+ }
+
Sample application
==================
--
2.35.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists