lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <889f39b7-92dc-1c37-e164-b16610de9999@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 18:18:50 +0800 From: shaozhengchao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com> To: Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@...il.com>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, <jiri@...nulli.us>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>, <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, <wanghai38@...wei.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: sched: fix NULL pointer dereference in mq_attach On 2023/5/29 16:59, Peilin Ye wrote: > On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 09:10:23AM +0800, shaozhengchao wrote: >> On 2023/5/29 3:05, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: >>> On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 5:30 AM Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com> wrote: >>>> When use the following command to test: >>>> 1)ip link add bond0 type bond >>>> 2)ip link set bond0 up >>>> 3)tc qdisc add dev bond0 root handle ffff: mq >>>> 4)tc qdisc replace dev bond0 parent ffff:fff1 handle ffff: mq >>> >>> This is fixed by Peilin in this ongoing discussion: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/cover.1684887977.git.peilin.ye@bytedance.com/ >>> >> Thank you for your reply. I have notice Peilin's patches before, >> and test after the patch is incorporated in local host. But it still >> triggers the problem. >> Peilin's patches can be filtered out when the query result of >> qdisc_lookup is of the ingress type. Here is 4/6 patch in his patches. >> +if (q->flags & TCQ_F_INGRESS) { >> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, >> + "Cannot regraft ingress or clsact Qdiscs"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> +} >> However, the query result of my test case in qdisc_lookup is mq. >> Therefore, the patch cannot solve my problem. > > Ack, they are different: patch [4/6] prevents ingress (clsact) Qdiscs > from being regrafted (to elsewhere), and Zhengchao's patch prevents other > Qdiscs from being regrafted to ffff:fff1. > > Thanks, > Peilin Ye > Hi Peilin: Thank you for your ack. Zhengchao Shao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists