netdev - Re: pull-request: bpf-next 2023-05-26

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <484ffbc6-69e8-864e-35c5-61c38fd0c116@iogearbox.net>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 11:29:50 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
 ast@...nel.org, andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull-request: bpf-next 2023-05-26

On 5/27/23 2:30 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 27 May 2023 00:27:47 +0200 Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> 1) Add the capability to destroy sockets in BPF through a new kfunc, from Aditi Ghag.
> 
> Is there a reason this wasn't CCed to netdev?

Hm, good point. I think this was oversight as this was submitter's first patch series
for upstream. I did see Paolo reviewing one of the revisions, but yes netdev should have
been in Cc throughout all the revisions. Sorry about that, we'll watch out the Cc list
more closely and point this out if this happens again in future.

Thanks,
Daniel