[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230530123929.42472e9f@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 12:39:29 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Make gro complete function to return void
On Tue, 30 May 2023 17:48:22 +0200 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > tcp_gro_complete seems fairly trivial. Any reason not to make it an
> > inline and avoid another function call in the datapath?
>
> Probably, although it is a regular function call, not an indirect one.
>
> In the grand total of driver rx napi + GRO cost, saving a few cycles
> per GRO completed packet is quite small.
IOW please make sure you include the performance analysis quantifying
the win, if you want to make this a static inline. Or let us know if
the patch is good as is, I'm keeping it in pw for now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists