| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20230530063829.2493909-1-jiri@resnulli.us>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 08:38:29 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
saeedm@...dia.com,
moshe@...dia.com,
simon.horman@...igine.com,
leon@...nel.org
Subject: [patch net-next] devlink: bring port new reply back
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
In the offending fixes commit I mistakenly removed the reply message of
the port new command. I was under impression it is a new port
notification, partly due to the "notify" in the name of the helper
function. Bring the code sending reply with new port message back, this
time putting it directly to devlink_nl_cmd_port_new_doit()
Fixes: c496daeb8630 ("devlink: remove duplicate port notification")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
---
.../ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/sf/devlink.c | 9 ++++--
.../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/sf/sf.h | 3 +-
include/net/devlink.h | 4 ++-
net/devlink/leftover.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++-
4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/sf/devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/sf/devlink.c
index c7d4691cb65a..9c02e5ea797c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/sf/devlink.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/sf/devlink.c
@@ -282,7 +282,8 @@ int mlx5_devlink_sf_port_fn_state_set(struct devlink_port *dl_port,
static int mlx5_sf_add(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, struct mlx5_sf_table *table,
const struct devlink_port_new_attrs *new_attr,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
+ struct devlink_port **dl_port)
{
struct mlx5_eswitch *esw = dev->priv.eswitch;
struct mlx5_sf *sf;
@@ -296,6 +297,7 @@ static int mlx5_sf_add(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, struct mlx5_sf_table *table,
new_attr->controller, new_attr->sfnum);
if (err)
goto esw_err;
+ *dl_port = &sf->dl_port;
trace_mlx5_sf_add(dev, sf->port_index, sf->controller, sf->hw_fn_id, new_attr->sfnum);
return 0;
@@ -336,7 +338,8 @@ mlx5_sf_new_check_attr(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, const struct devlink_port_new_
int mlx5_devlink_sf_port_new(struct devlink *devlink,
const struct devlink_port_new_attrs *new_attr,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
+ struct devlink_port **dl_port)
{
struct mlx5_core_dev *dev = devlink_priv(devlink);
struct mlx5_sf_table *table;
@@ -352,7 +355,7 @@ int mlx5_devlink_sf_port_new(struct devlink *devlink,
"Port add is only supported in eswitch switchdev mode or SF ports are disabled.");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
- err = mlx5_sf_add(dev, table, new_attr, extack);
+ err = mlx5_sf_add(dev, table, new_attr, extack, dl_port);
mlx5_sf_table_put(table);
return err;
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/sf/sf.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/sf/sf.h
index c5430b8dcdf6..860f9ddb7107 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/sf/sf.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/sf/sf.h
@@ -20,7 +20,8 @@ void mlx5_sf_table_cleanup(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev);
int mlx5_devlink_sf_port_new(struct devlink *devlink,
const struct devlink_port_new_attrs *add_attr,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
+ struct devlink_port **dl_port);
int mlx5_devlink_sf_port_del(struct devlink *devlink,
struct devlink_port *dl_port,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
index ec109b39c3ea..2ddb9dad3225 100644
--- a/include/net/devlink.h
+++ b/include/net/devlink.h
@@ -1500,6 +1500,7 @@ struct devlink_ops {
* @devlink: Devlink instance
* @attrs: attributes of the new port
* @extack: extack for reporting error messages
+ * @devlink_port: pointer to store new devlink port pointer
*
* Devlink core will call this device driver function upon user request
* to create a new port function of a specified flavor and optional
@@ -1512,7 +1513,8 @@ struct devlink_ops {
*/
int (*port_new)(struct devlink *devlink,
const struct devlink_port_new_attrs *attrs,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
+ struct devlink_port **devlink_port);
/**
* port_del() - Delete a port function
* @devlink: Devlink instance
diff --git a/net/devlink/leftover.c b/net/devlink/leftover.c
index 9e801b749194..269aa1a6a13c 100644
--- a/net/devlink/leftover.c
+++ b/net/devlink/leftover.c
@@ -1360,6 +1360,9 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_port_new_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack = info->extack;
struct devlink_port_new_attrs new_attrs = {};
struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
+ struct devlink_port *devlink_port;
+ struct sk_buff *msg;
+ int err;
if (!devlink->ops->port_new || !devlink->ops->port_del)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -1390,7 +1393,30 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_port_new_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
new_attrs.sfnum_valid = true;
}
- return devlink->ops->port_new(devlink, &new_attrs, extack);
+ err = devlink->ops->port_new(devlink, &new_attrs,
+ extack, &devlink_port);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ msg = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!msg) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_out_port_del;
+ }
+ err = devlink_nl_port_fill(msg, devlink_port, DEVLINK_CMD_NEW,
+ info->snd_portid, info->snd_seq, 0, NULL);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(err))
+ goto err_out_msg_free;
+ err = genlmsg_reply(msg, info);
+ if (err)
+ goto err_out_port_del;
+ return 0;
+
+err_out_msg_free:
+ nlmsg_free(msg);
+err_out_port_del:
+ devlink->ops->port_del(devlink, devlink_port, NULL);
+ return err;
}
static int devlink_nl_cmd_port_del_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists