[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <574370.1685523113@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 09:51:53 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>, Tom Herbert <tom@...ntonium.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] kcm: Support MSG_SPLICE_PAGES
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2023 15:49:22 +0100 David Howells wrote:
> > + err = skb_splice_from_iter(skb, &msg->msg_iter, copy,
> > + sk->sk_allocation);
> > + if (err < 0) {
> > + if (err == -EMSGSIZE)
> > + goto wait_for_memory;
> > + goto out_error;
> > + }
> >
>
> should there be a:
>
> copy = err;
> or:
> copy -= msg_data_left(msg);
>
> or some such here? Can we safely assume that skb_splice_from_iter() will
> copy all or nothing?
Yeah. Good point. I didn't add one because the normal operation code doesn't
do that - but I guess that's all-or-nothing.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists