netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] sched/topology: add for_each_numa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230531100125.39d73e1d@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 10:01:25 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Pawel
 Chmielewski <pawel.chmielewski@...el.com>, Leon Romanovsky
 <leon@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Andy Shevchenko
 <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Rasmus Villemoes
 <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra
 <peterz@...radead.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Vincent Guittot
 <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel
 Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
 Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
 Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
 <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Barry
 Song <baohua@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] sched/topology: add for_each_numa_cpu() macro

On Wed, 31 May 2023 08:43:46 -0700 Yury Norov wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 10:18:01AM -0700, Yury Norov wrote:
> > for_each_cpu() is widely used in kernel, and it's beneficial to create
> > a NUMA-aware version of the macro.
> > 
> > Recently added for_each_numa_hop_mask() works, but switching existing
> > codebase to it is not an easy process.
> > 
> > This series adds for_each_numa_cpu(), which is designed to be similar to
> > the for_each_cpu(). It allows to convert existing code to NUMA-aware as
> > simple as adding a hop iterator variable and passing it inside new macro.
> > for_each_numa_cpu() takes care of the rest.  
> 
> Hi Jakub,
> 
> Now that the series reviewed, can you consider taking it in sched
> tree?

Do you mean someone else or did you mean the net-next tree?