netdev - Re: [PATCH net] neighbour: fix unaligned access to pneigh

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 20:41:32 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Qingfang DENG <dqfext@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>, 
	Ville Nuorvala <vnuorval@....hut.fi>, Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@...ux-ipv6.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Qingfang DENG <qingfang.deng@...lower.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] neighbour: fix unaligned access to pneigh_entry

On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 8:16 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 31 May 2023 18:42:33 +0800 Qingfang DENG wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
> >       u8                      key[];
> > +#else
> > +     u8                      key[] __aligned(4);
> > +#endif
>
> I'd appreciate a second opinion, but to me it's very unlikely we'd save
> any memory even with efficient aligned access here. No reasonably key
> will fit into 3 bytes, right? So we can as well avoid the ifdef and
> make the key[] always aligned. Or preferably, if it doesn't cause
> compilation issues, make the type of the key u32?

Same feeling, we could avoid the CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS ifdef.