netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net: sched: fix NULL pointer dereference in mq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAM0EoMkLUPLJgiJBpdVWqH_-tOT4ijgvq-jT5D3hV-vW4k6niQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 20:43:33 -0400
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@...il.com>, shaozhengchao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us, 
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, 
	weiyongjun1@...wei.com, yuehaibing@...wei.com, wanghai38@...wei.com, 
	peilin.ye@...edance.com, cong.wang@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: sched: fix NULL pointer dereference in mq_attach

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 6:16 AM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 17:17 -0700, Peilin Ye wrote:
> > On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 09:53:28AM -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 4:59 AM Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > Ack, they are different: patch [4/6] prevents ingress (clsact) Qdiscs
> > > > from being regrafted (to elsewhere), and Zhengchao's patch prevents other
> > > > Qdiscs from being regrafted to ffff:fff1.
> > >
> > > Ok, at first glance it was not obvious.
> > > Do we catch all combinations? for egress (0xffffffff) allowed minor is
> > > 0xfff3 (clsact::) and 0xffff. For ingress (0xfffffff1) allowed minor
> > > is 0xfff1 and 0xfff2(clsact).
> >
> > ffff:fff1 is special in tc_modify_qdisc(); if minor isn't fff1,
> > tc_modify_qdisc() thinks user wants to graft a Qdisc under existing ingress
> > or clsact Qdisc:
> >
> >       if (clid != TC_H_INGRESS) {     /* ffff:fff1 */
> >               p = qdisc_lookup(dev, TC_H_MAJ(clid));
> >               if (!p) {
> >                       NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Failed to find specified qdisc");
> >                       return -ENOENT;
> >               }
> >               q = qdisc_leaf(p, clid);
> >       } else if (dev_ingress_queue_create(dev)) {
> >               q = dev_ingress_queue(dev)->qdisc_sleeping;
> >       }
> >
> > This will go to the "parent != NULL" path in qdisc_graft(), and
> > sch_{ingress,clsact} doesn't implement cl_ops->graft(), so -EOPNOTSUPP will
> > be returned.
> >
> > In short, yes, I think ffff:fff1 is the only case should be fixed.
> >
> > By the way I just noticed that currently it is possible to create a e.g.
> > HTB class with a class ID of ffff:fff1...
> >
> >   $ tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle ffff: htb default fff1
> >   $ tc class add dev eth0 \
> >             parent ffff: classid ffff:fff1 htb rate 100%
> >
> > Regrafting a Qdisc to such classes won't work as intended at all.  It's a
> > separate issue though.
>
> Jamal, are you ok with the above explanation? Perhaps it would be
> worthy to add a specific test-case under tc-testing for this issue?
>

I am fine with this one going in as is and then adding tests. I will ACK it.

cheers,
jamal

> Thanks!
>
> Paolo
>