lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230530233438.572db3fb@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 23:34:38 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com> Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>, Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>, Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>, Akhil R <akhilrajeev@...dia.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] fix fwnode_irq_get[_byname()] returnvalue On Mon, 29 May 2023 09:22:15 +0300 Matti Vaittinen wrote: > The fwnode_irq_get() and the fwnode_irq_get_byname() may have returned > zero if mapping the IRQ fails. This contradicts the > fwnode_irq_get_byname() documentation. Furthermore, returning zero or > errno on error is unepected and can easily lead to problems > like. What's the merging plan? Could patch 1 go to a stable branch and then driver trees can pull it in and apply their respective patches locally?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists