netdev - Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] fix fwnode_irq_get[

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230530233438.572db3fb@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 23:34:38 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>, Andy Shevchenko
 <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
 Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>, Sakari Ailus
 <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
 <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
 Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
 Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, Jonathan Cameron
 <jic23@...nel.org>, Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>, Marcin Wojtas
 <mw@...ihalf.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jonathan Neuschäfer
 <j.neuschaefer@....net>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Paul
 Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>, Akhil R <akhilrajeev@...dia.com>,
 linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org,
 linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] fix fwnode_irq_get[_byname()] returnvalue

On Mon, 29 May 2023 09:22:15 +0300 Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> The fwnode_irq_get() and the fwnode_irq_get_byname() may have returned
> zero if mapping the IRQ fails. This contradicts the
> fwnode_irq_get_byname() documentation. Furthermore, returning zero or
> errno on error is unepected and can easily lead to problems
> like.

What's the merging plan? Could patch 1 go to a stable branch 
and then driver trees can pull it in and apply their respective 
patches locally?