netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] netlink: Reverse the patch which removed filtering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230601175621.ugsgt2ta4c5b6wim@revolver>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 13:56:21 -0400
From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
To: Anjali Kulkarni <anjali.k.kulkarni@...cle.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, david@...es.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, zbr@...emap.net, brauner@...nel.org,
        johannes@...solutions.net, ecree.xilinx@...il.com, leon@...nel.org,
        keescook@...omium.org, socketcan@...tkopp.net, petrm@...dia.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] netlink: Reverse the patch which removed filtering

* Anjali Kulkarni <anjali.k.kulkarni@...cle.com> [691231 23:00]:
> To use filtering at the connector & cn_proc layers, we need to enable
> filtering in the netlink layer. This reverses the patch which removed
> netlink filtering.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anjali Kulkarni <anjali.k.kulkarni@...cle.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/netlink.h  |  5 +++++
>  net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/netlink.h b/include/linux/netlink.h
> index c43ac7690eca..866bbc5a4c8d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netlink.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netlink.h
> @@ -206,6 +206,11 @@ bool netlink_strict_get_check(struct sk_buff *skb);
>  int netlink_unicast(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb, __u32 portid, int nonblock);
>  int netlink_broadcast(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb, __u32 portid,
>  		      __u32 group, gfp_t allocation);
> +int netlink_broadcast_filtered(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> +			       __u32 portid, __u32 group, gfp_t allocation,
> +			       int (*filter)(struct sock *dsk,
> +					     struct sk_buff *skb, void *data),
> +			       void *filter_data);

Nit, just a personal preference that if you indent with two tabs for
function definitions, then it is clear where the code starts and you
have more room for larger argument lists here.  It also helps when
changing the return type as you don't have to redo all the spacing.

>  int netlink_set_err(struct sock *ssk, __u32 portid, __u32 group, int code);
>  int netlink_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
>  int netlink_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> index c64277659753..003c7e6ec9be 100644
> --- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> @@ -1432,6 +1432,8 @@ struct netlink_broadcast_data {
>  	int delivered;
>  	gfp_t allocation;
>  	struct sk_buff *skb, *skb2;
> +	int (*tx_filter)(struct sock *dsk, struct sk_buff *skb, void *data);
> +	void *tx_data;
>  };
>  
>  static void do_one_broadcast(struct sock *sk,
> @@ -1485,6 +1487,11 @@ static void do_one_broadcast(struct sock *sk,
>  			p->delivery_failure = 1;
>  		goto out;
>  	}

new line here please.

> +	if (p->tx_filter && p->tx_filter(sk, p->skb2, p->tx_data)) {
> +		kfree_skb(p->skb2);
> +		p->skb2 = NULL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}

new line here please.

Since there are now two times that the same steps are being used for
unrolling (yours and below).  It might be better to make a new goto
label after the successful one?

>  	if (sk_filter(sk, p->skb2)) {
>  		kfree_skb(p->skb2);
>  		p->skb2 = NULL;
> @@ -1507,8 +1514,12 @@ static void do_one_broadcast(struct sock *sk,
>  	sock_put(sk);
>  }
>  
> -int netlink_broadcast(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 portid,
> -		      u32 group, gfp_t allocation)
> +int netlink_broadcast_filtered(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> +			       u32 portid,
> +			       u32 group, gfp_t allocation,
> +			       int (*filter)(struct sock *dsk,
> +					     struct sk_buff *skb, void *data),
> +			       void *filter_data)

Same comment here about the two tab indent.

>  {
>  	struct net *net = sock_net(ssk);
>  	struct netlink_broadcast_data info;
> @@ -1527,6 +1538,8 @@ int netlink_broadcast(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 portid,
>  	info.allocation = allocation;
>  	info.skb = skb;
>  	info.skb2 = NULL;
> +	info.tx_filter = filter;
> +	info.tx_data = filter_data;
>  
>  	/* While we sleep in clone, do not allow to change socket list */
>  
> @@ -1552,6 +1565,14 @@ int netlink_broadcast(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 portid,
>  	}
>  	return -ESRCH;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(netlink_broadcast_filtered);
> +
> +int netlink_broadcast(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 portid,
> +		      u32 group, gfp_t allocation)
> +{
> +	return netlink_broadcast_filtered(ssk, skb, portid, group, allocation,
> +					  NULL, NULL);
> +}
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(netlink_broadcast);
>  
>  struct netlink_set_err_data {
> -- 
> 2.40.0
>