netdev - Re: [PATCH 12/13] x86/jitalloc: prepare to allocate exectuatble memory as ROX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a51c041b61e2916d2b91c990349aabc6cb9836aa.camel@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 18:13:44 +0000
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
To: "kent.overstreet@...ux.dev" <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
CC: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "mcgrof@...nel.org"
	<mcgrof@...nel.org>, "deller@....de" <deller@....de>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "davem@...emloft.net"
	<davem@...emloft.net>, "linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"hca@...ux.ibm.com" <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, "catalin.marinas@....com"
	<catalin.marinas@....com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, "palmer@...belt.com" <palmer@...belt.com>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "chenhuacai@...nel.org"
	<chenhuacai@...nel.org>, "tsbogend@...ha.franken.de"
	<tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, "linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>, "rppt@...nel.org" <rppt@...nel.org>,
	"mpe@...erman.id.au" <mpe@...erman.id.au>, "linux-s390@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, "christophe.leroy@...roup.eu"
	<christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, "rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>, "dinguyen@...nel.org"
	<dinguyen@...nel.org>, "naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com"
	<naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>, "sparclinux@...r.kernel.org"
	<sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-modules@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>, "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "song@...nel.org" <song@...nel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "loongarch@...ts.linux.dev"
	<loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>, "akpm@...ux-foundation.org"
	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] x86/jitalloc: prepare to allocate exectuatble
 memory as ROX

On Thu, 2023-06-01 at 14:00 -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 04:54:27PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> > It is just a local flush, but I wonder how much text_poke()ing is
> > too
> > much. A lot of the are even inside loops. Can't it do the batch
> > version
> > at least?
> > 
> > The other thing, and maybe this is in paranoia category, but it's
> > probably at least worth noting. Before the modules were not made
> > executable until all of the code was finalized. Now they are made
> > executable in an intermediate state and then patched later. It
> > might
> > weaken the CFI stuff, but also it just kind of seems a bit
> > unbounded
> > for dealing with executable code.
> 
> I believe bpf starts out by initializing new executable memory with
> illegal opcodes, maybe we should steal that and make it standard.

I was thinking of modules which have a ton of alternatives, errata
fixes, etc applied to them after the initial sections are written to
the to-be-executable mapping. I thought this had zeroed pages to start,
which seems ok.

> 
> > Preparing the modules in a separate RW mapping, and then
> > text_poke()ing
> > the whole thing in when you are done would resolve both of these.
> 
> text_poke() _does_ create a separate RW mapping.

Sorry, I meant a separate RW allocation.

> 
> The thing that sucks about text_poke() is that it always does a full
> TLB
> flush, and AFAICT that's not remotely needed. What it really wants to
> be
> doing is conceptually just
> 
> kmap_local()
> mempcy()
> kunmap_loca()
> flush_icache();
> 
> ...except that kmap_local() won't actually create a new mapping on
> non-highmem architectures, so text_poke() open codes it.

Text poke creates only a local CPU RW mapping. It's more secure because
other threads can't write to it. It also only needs to flush the local
core when it's done since it's not using a shared MM. It used to use
the fixmap, which is similar to what you are describing I think.