[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALnP8ZbH+V5gq90+m8uwYy_8V-FKQtoVmEdj1DKw051RdBJ8xw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 07:19:43 -0700
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, deb.chatterjee@...el.com, anjali.singhai@...el.com,
namrata.limaye@...el.com, tom@...anda.io, p4tc-discussions@...devconf.info,
Mahesh.Shirshyad@....com, Vipin.Jain@....com, tomasz.osinski@...el.com,
jiri@...nulli.us, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, vladbu@...dia.com,
simon.horman@...igine.com, khalidm@...dia.com, toke@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 03/28] net/sched: act_api: increase TCA_ID_MAX
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 07:02:07AM -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h
> @@ -140,9 +140,9 @@ enum tca_id {
> TCA_ID_MPLS,
> TCA_ID_CT,
> TCA_ID_GATE,
> - TCA_ID_DYN,
> + TCA_ID_DYN = 256,
> /* other actions go here */
> - __TCA_ID_MAX = 255
> + __TCA_ID_MAX = 1023
> };
It feels that this patch should go together with the 1st one, when
dynamic actions were introduced. When I was reading that patch, I was
wondering about possible conflicts with a new loaded dynamic action
and some userspace app using a new tca_id definition (it is UAPI,
after all) that overlaps with it.
Marcelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists