netdev - [net-next V2 12/14] net/mlx5: E-switch, mark devcom as not ready when all eswitches are unpaired

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230602191301.47004-13-saeed@kernel.org>
Date: Fri,  2 Jun 2023 12:12:59 -0700
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
	Shay Drory <shayd@...dia.com>,
	Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>,
	Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>
Subject: [net-next V2 12/14] net/mlx5: E-switch, mark devcom as not ready when all eswitches are unpaired

From: Shay Drory <shayd@...dia.com>

Whenever an eswitch is unpaired with another, the driver mark devcom
as not ready. While this is correct in case we are pairing only two
eswitches, in order to support pairing of more than two eswitches,
driver need to mark devcom as not ready only when all eswitches are
unpaired.

Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h         | 1 +
 .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c    | 8 +++++++-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
index 9833d1a587cc..d6e4ca436f39 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
@@ -343,6 +343,7 @@ struct mlx5_eswitch {
 	int                     mode;
 	u16                     manager_vport;
 	u16                     first_host_vport;
+	u8			num_peers;
 	struct mlx5_esw_functions esw_funcs;
 	struct {
 		u32             large_group_num;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
index aeb15b10048e..09367a320741 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
@@ -2836,6 +2836,8 @@ static int mlx5_esw_offloads_devcom_event(int event,
 
 		esw->paired[mlx5_get_dev_index(peer_esw->dev)] = true;
 		peer_esw->paired[mlx5_get_dev_index(esw->dev)] = true;
+		esw->num_peers++;
+		peer_esw->num_peers++;
 		mlx5_devcom_comp_set_ready(devcom, MLX5_DEVCOM_ESW_OFFLOADS, true);
 		break;
 
@@ -2843,7 +2845,10 @@ static int mlx5_esw_offloads_devcom_event(int event,
 		if (!esw->paired[mlx5_get_dev_index(peer_esw->dev)])
 			break;
 
-		mlx5_devcom_comp_set_ready(devcom, MLX5_DEVCOM_ESW_OFFLOADS, false);
+		peer_esw->num_peers--;
+		esw->num_peers--;
+		if (!esw->num_peers && !peer_esw->num_peers)
+			mlx5_devcom_comp_set_ready(devcom, MLX5_DEVCOM_ESW_OFFLOADS, false);
 		esw->paired[mlx5_get_dev_index(peer_esw->dev)] = false;
 		peer_esw->paired[mlx5_get_dev_index(esw->dev)] = false;
 		mlx5_esw_offloads_unpair(peer_esw, esw);
@@ -2884,6 +2889,7 @@ void mlx5_esw_offloads_devcom_init(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw)
 				       mlx5_esw_offloads_devcom_event,
 				       esw);
 
+	esw->num_peers = 0;
 	mlx5_devcom_send_event(devcom,
 			       MLX5_DEVCOM_ESW_OFFLOADS,
 			       ESW_OFFLOADS_DEVCOM_PAIR, esw);
-- 
2.40.1