netdev - [net-next V2 06/14] net/mlx5: E-switch, enlarge peer miss group table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230602191301.47004-7-saeed@kernel.org>
Date: Fri,  2 Jun 2023 12:12:53 -0700
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
	Shay Drory <shayd@...dia.com>,
	Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>,
	Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>
Subject: [net-next V2 06/14] net/mlx5: E-switch, enlarge peer miss group table

From: Shay Drory <shayd@...dia.com>

There is an implicit assumption that peer miss group table
require to handle only a single peer.
Also, there is an assumption that total_vports of the master
is greater or equal to the total_vports of each peer.
Change the code to support peer miss group for more than one peer.

Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
index a767f3d52c76..ca69ed487413 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
@@ -1573,6 +1573,7 @@ esw_create_peer_esw_miss_group(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
 			       u32 *flow_group_in,
 			       int *ix)
 {
+	int max_peer_ports = (esw->total_vports - 1) * (MLX5_MAX_PORTS - 1);
 	int inlen = MLX5_ST_SZ_BYTES(create_flow_group_in);
 	struct mlx5_flow_group *g;
 	void *match_criteria;
@@ -1599,8 +1600,8 @@ esw_create_peer_esw_miss_group(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
 
 	MLX5_SET(create_flow_group_in, flow_group_in, start_flow_index, *ix);
 	MLX5_SET(create_flow_group_in, flow_group_in, end_flow_index,
-		 *ix + esw->total_vports - 1);
-	*ix += esw->total_vports;
+		 *ix + max_peer_ports);
+	*ix += max_peer_ports + 1;
 
 	g = mlx5_create_flow_group(fdb, flow_group_in);
 	if (IS_ERR(g)) {
@@ -1702,7 +1703,7 @@ static int esw_create_offloads_fdb_tables(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw)
 	 * total vports of the peer (currently is also uses esw->total_vports).
 	 */
 	table_size = MLX5_MAX_PORTS * (esw->total_vports * MAX_SQ_NVPORTS + MAX_PF_SQ) +
-		     esw->total_vports * 2 + MLX5_ESW_MISS_FLOWS;
+		     esw->total_vports * MLX5_MAX_PORTS + MLX5_ESW_MISS_FLOWS;
 
 	/* create the slow path fdb with encap set, so further table instances
 	 * can be created at run time while VFs are probed if the FW allows that.
-- 
2.40.1