[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230602160214.292749c9@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 16:02:14 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Anjali Kulkarni <anjali.k.kulkarni@...cle.com>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, Evgeniy
Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
"johannes@...solutions.net" <johannes@...solutions.net>,
"ecree.xilinx@...il.com" <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>, "leon@...nel.org"
<leon@...nel.org>, "keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"socketcan@...tkopp.net" <socketcan@...tkopp.net>, "petrm@...dia.com"
<petrm@...dia.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] connector/cn_proc: Performance improvements
On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 22:23:01 +0000 Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
> > Not much, really. I think the requirement is to exit with a non-zero
> > return code on failure, which you already do. 0 means success; 1 means
> > failure; 2 means skip, IIRC.
> >
> > The main work in your case would be that the selftest needs to do its
> > checking and exit, so the stimuli must be triggered automatically.
> > (You can use a bash script to drive the events.)
>
> Thanks! So this will be part of the kselftest infra right?
> https://docs.kernel.org/dev-tools/kselftest.html ?
Yes, that's right.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists