[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230602235859.79042ff0@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 23:58:59 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Justin Chen <justin.chen@...adcom.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, florian.fainelli@...adcom.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
opendmb@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, richardcochran@...il.com, sumit.semwal@...aro.org,
christian.koenig@....com, simon.horman@...igine.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 3/6] net: bcmasp: Add support for ASP2.0
Ethernet controller
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 15:12:28 -0700 Justin Chen wrote:
> + /* general stats */
> + STAT_NETDEV(rx_packets),
> + STAT_NETDEV(tx_packets),
> + STAT_NETDEV(rx_bytes),
> + STAT_NETDEV(tx_bytes),
> + STAT_NETDEV(rx_errors),
> + STAT_NETDEV(tx_errors),
> + STAT_NETDEV(rx_dropped),
> + STAT_NETDEV(tx_dropped),
> + STAT_NETDEV(multicast),
please don't report standard interface stats in ethtool -S
> + /* UniMAC RSV counters */
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_64_octets", mib.rx.pkt_cnt.cnt_64),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_65_127_oct", mib.rx.pkt_cnt.cnt_127),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_128_255_oct", mib.rx.pkt_cnt.cnt_255),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_256_511_oct", mib.rx.pkt_cnt.cnt_511),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_512_1023_oct", mib.rx.pkt_cnt.cnt_1023),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_1024_1518_oct", mib.rx.pkt_cnt.cnt_1518),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_vlan_1519_1522_oct", mib.rx.pkt_cnt.cnt_mgv),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_1522_2047_oct", mib.rx.pkt_cnt.cnt_2047),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_2048_4095_oct", mib.rx.pkt_cnt.cnt_4095),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_4096_9216_oct", mib.rx.pkt_cnt.cnt_9216),
these should also be removed, and you should implement @get_rmon_stats.
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_pkts", mib.rx.pkt),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_bytes", mib.rx.bytes),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_multicast", mib.rx.mca),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_broadcast", mib.rx.bca),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_fcs", mib.rx.fcs),
there's a FCS error statistic in the standard stats, no need to
duplicate
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_control", mib.rx.cf),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_pause", mib.rx.pf),
@get_pause_stats
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_unknown", mib.rx.uo),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_align", mib.rx.aln),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_outrange", mib.rx.flr),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_code", mib.rx.cde),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_carrier", mib.rx.fcr),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_oversize", mib.rx.ovr),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_jabber", mib.rx.jbr),
these look like candidates from standard stats, too.
Please read thru:
https://docs.kernel.org/next/networking/statistics.html
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_mtu_err", mib.rx.mtue),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_good_pkts", mib.rx.pok),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_unicast", mib.rx.uc),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_ppp", mib.rx.ppp),
> + STAT_BCMASP_MIB_RX("rx_crc", mib.rx.rcrc),
hm, what's the difference between rx_crc and rx_fcs ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists