[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZH2zb7smT/HbFx9k@shikoro>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 12:05:35 +0200
From: 'Wolfram Sang' <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com,
jsd@...ihalf.com, Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com, andrew@...n.ch,
hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
mengyuanlou@...-swift.com,
'Piotr Raczynski' <piotr.raczynski@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v11 2/9] i2c: designware: Add driver support for
Wangxun 10Gb NIC
> Yes, other patches will build even without this patch. But SFP will not work.
> This patch series implement I2C, GPIO, SFP and PHYLINK. The support of SFP
> is dependent on I2C and GPIO. If these patches will be end up merging in the
> same upstream version, it's not a problem to merge them in different trees,
> I think.
That's how I saw it as well.
Applied to for-next, thanks!
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists