[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27d2e946-0f81-40e7-43f9-00369883f68b@microchip.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 14:03:02 +0200
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, Varshini Rajendran
<varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Claudiu Beznea
<claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "Paolo
Abeni" <pabeni@...hat.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Michael Turquette
<mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Sebastian Reichel
<sre@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Gregory Clement
<gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Balamanikandan Gunasundar <balamanikandan.gunasundar@...rochip.com>,
Mihai.Sain <mihai.sain@...rochip.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Netdev
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <Hari.PrasathGE@...rochip.com>, <cristian.birsan@...rochip.com>,
<durai.manickamkr@...rochip.com>, <manikandan.m@...rochip.com>,
<dharma.b@...rochip.com>, <nayabbasha.sayed@...rochip.com>,
<balakrishnan.s@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/21] dt-bindings: microchip: atmel,at91rm9200-tcb: add
sam9x60 compatible
On 05/06/2023 at 09:04, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023, at 08:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 03/06/2023 22:02, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
>>> Add sam9x60 compatible string support in the schema file
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/atmel,at91rm9200-tcb.yaml | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/atmel,at91rm9200-tcb.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/atmel,at91rm9200-tcb.yaml
>>> index a46411149571..c70c77a5e8e5 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/atmel,at91rm9200-tcb.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/atmel,at91rm9200-tcb.yaml
>>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ properties:
>>> - atmel,at91rm9200-tcb
>>> - atmel,at91sam9x5-tcb
>>> - atmel,sama5d2-tcb
>>> + - microchip,sam9x60-tcb
>>
>> No wildcards.
>
> sam9x60 is the actual name of the chip, it's no wildcard. For sam9x70,
> sam9x72 and sam9x75, I think using sam9x7 as the compatible string
> is probably fine, as long as they are actually the same chip. Again,
> the 'x' in there is not a wildcard but part of the name.
Yes, exactly Arnd, for those two SoC, 'x' is not a wildcard.
Best regards,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas Ferre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists