| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <0bd40fd8-e666-e2a3-04da-501a0e7b97a9@sberdevices.ru>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 12:34:22 +0300
From: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
To: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>, Jiang Wang
<jiang.wang@...edance.com>
CC: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, Stefano Garzarella
<sgarzare@...hat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jason Wang
<jasowang@...hat.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>, Haiyang Zhang
<haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui
<decui@...rosoft.com>, Bryan Tan <bryantan@...are.com>, Vishnu Dasa
<vdasa@...are.com>, VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
Krasnov Arseniy <oxffffaa@...il.com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v3 8/8] tests: add vsock dgram tests
Sorry, CC mailing lists
On 06.06.2023 12:29, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> Hello Bobby and Jiang! Small remarks(sorry for this letter layout, I add multiple newline over comments):
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/util.c b/tools/testing/vsock/util.c
> index 01b636d3039a..45e35da48b40 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/vsock/util.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/util.c
> @@ -260,6 +260,57 @@ void send_byte(int fd, int expected_ret, int flags)
> }
> }
>
> +/* Transmit one byte and check the return value.
> + *
> + * expected_ret:
> + * <0 Negative errno (for testing errors)
> + * 0 End-of-file
> + * 1 Success
> + */
> +void sendto_byte(int fd, const struct sockaddr *dest_addr, int len, int expected_ret,
> + int flags)
> +{
> + const uint8_t byte = 'A';
> + ssize_t nwritten;
> +
> + timeout_begin(TIMEOUT);
> + do {
> + nwritten = sendto(fd, &byte, sizeof(byte), flags, dest_addr,
> + len);
> + timeout_check("write");
> + } while (nwritten < 0 && errno == EINTR);
> + timeout_end();
> +
> + if (expected_ret < 0) {
> + if (nwritten != -1) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "bogus sendto(2) return value %zd\n",
> + nwritten);
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> + if (errno != -expected_ret) {
> + perror("write");
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (nwritten < 0) {
> + perror("write");
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> + if (nwritten == 0) {
> + if (expected_ret == 0)
> + return;
> +
> + fprintf(stderr, "unexpected EOF while sending byte\n");
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> + if (nwritten != sizeof(byte)) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "bogus sendto(2) return value %zd\n", nwritten);
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> +
> }
>
>
>
> ^^^
> May be short check that 'nwritten' != 'expected_ret' will be enough? Then print expected and
> real value. Here and in 'recvfrom_byte()' below.
>
>
>
>
> +}
> +
> /* Receive one byte and check the return value.
> *
> * expected_ret:
> @@ -313,6 +364,60 @@ void recv_byte(int fd, int expected_ret, int flags)
> }
> }
>
> +/* Receive one byte and check the return value.
> + *
> + * expected_ret:
> + * <0 Negative errno (for testing errors)
> + * 0 End-of-file
> + * 1 Success
> + */
> +void recvfrom_byte(int fd, struct sockaddr *src_addr, socklen_t *addrlen,
> + int expected_ret, int flags)
> +{
> + uint8_t byte;
> + ssize_t nread;
> +
> + timeout_begin(TIMEOUT);
> + do {
> + nread = recvfrom(fd, &byte, sizeof(byte), flags, src_addr, addrlen);
> + timeout_check("read");
> + } while (nread < 0 && errno == EINTR);
> + timeout_end();
> +
> + if (expected_ret < 0) {
> + if (nread != -1) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "bogus recvfrom(2) return value %zd\n",
> + nread);
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> + if (errno != -expected_ret) {
> + perror("read");
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (nread < 0) {
> + perror("read");
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> + if (nread == 0) {
> + if (expected_ret == 0)
> + return;
> +
> + fprintf(stderr, "unexpected EOF while receiving byte\n");
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> + if (nread != sizeof(byte)) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "bogus recvfrom(2) return value %zd\n", nread);
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> + if (byte != 'A') {
> + fprintf(stderr, "unexpected byte read %c\n", byte);
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> +}
> +
> /* Run test cases. The program terminates if a failure occurs. */
> void run_tests(const struct test_case *test_cases,
> const struct test_opts *opts)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/util.h b/tools/testing/vsock/util.h
> index fb99208a95ea..6e5cd610bf05 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/vsock/util.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/util.h
> @@ -43,7 +43,11 @@ int vsock_seqpacket_accept(unsigned int cid, unsigned int port,
> struct sockaddr_vm *clientaddrp);
> void vsock_wait_remote_close(int fd);
> void send_byte(int fd, int expected_ret, int flags);
> +void sendto_byte(int fd, const struct sockaddr *dest_addr, int len, int expected_ret,
> + int flags);
> void recv_byte(int fd, int expected_ret, int flags);
> +void recvfrom_byte(int fd, struct sockaddr *src_addr, socklen_t *addrlen,
> + int expected_ret, int flags);
> void run_tests(const struct test_case *test_cases,
> const struct test_opts *opts);
> void list_tests(const struct test_case *test_cases);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
> index ac1bd3ac1533..851c3d65178d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
> @@ -202,6 +202,113 @@ static void test_stream_server_close_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
> close(fd);
> }
>
> +static void test_dgram_sendto_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
> +{
> + union {
> + struct sockaddr sa;
> + struct sockaddr_vm svm;
> + } addr = {
> + .svm = {
> + .svm_family = AF_VSOCK,
> + .svm_port = 1234,
> + .svm_cid = opts->peer_cid,
> + },
> + };
> + int fd;
> +
> + /* Wait for the server to be ready */
> + control_expectln("BIND");
> +
> + fd = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
> + if (fd < 0) {
> + perror("socket");
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> +
> + sendto_byte(fd, &addr.sa, sizeof(addr.svm), 1, 0);
> +
> + /* Notify the server that the client has finished */
> + control_writeln("DONE");
> +
> + close(fd);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_dgram_sendto_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
> +{
> + union {
> + struct sockaddr sa;
> + struct sockaddr_vm svm;
> + } addr = {
> + .svm = {
> + .svm_family = AF_VSOCK,
> + .svm_port = 1234,
> + .svm_cid = VMADDR_CID_ANY,
> + },
> + };
> + int fd;
> + int len = sizeof(addr.sa);
> +
> + fd = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
>
>
>
> ^^^
> I think we can check 'socket()' return value;
>
>
>
>
> +
> + if (bind(fd, &addr.sa, sizeof(addr.svm)) < 0) {
> + perror("bind");
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> +
> + /* Notify the client that the server is ready */
> + control_writeln("BIND");
> +
> + recvfrom_byte(fd, &addr.sa, &len, 1, 0);
> +
> + /* Wait for the client to finish */
> + control_expectln("DONE");
> +
> + close(fd);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_dgram_connect_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
> +{
> + union {
> + struct sockaddr sa;
> + struct sockaddr_vm svm;
> + } addr = {
> + .svm = {
> + .svm_family = AF_VSOCK,
> + .svm_port = 1234,
> + .svm_cid = opts->peer_cid,
> + },
> + };
> + int fd;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Wait for the server to be ready */
> + control_expectln("BIND");
> +
> + fd = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
> + if (fd < 0) {
> + perror("bind");
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> +
> + ret = connect(fd, &addr.sa, sizeof(addr.svm));
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + perror("connect");
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> +
> + send_byte(fd, 1, 0);
> +
> + /* Notify the server that the client has finished */
> + control_writeln("DONE");
> +
> + close(fd);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_dgram_connect_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
> +{
> + test_dgram_sendto_server(opts);
> +}
> +
> /* With the standard socket sizes, VMCI is able to support about 100
> * concurrent stream connections.
> */
> @@ -255,6 +362,77 @@ static void test_stream_multiconn_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
> close(fds[i]);
> }
>
> +static void test_dgram_multiconn_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
> +{
> + int fds[MULTICONN_NFDS];
> + int i;
> + union {
> + struct sockaddr sa;
> + struct sockaddr_vm svm;
> + } addr = {
> + .svm = {
> + .svm_family = AF_VSOCK,
> + .svm_port = 1234,
> + .svm_cid = opts->peer_cid,
> + },
> + };
> +
> + /* Wait for the server to be ready */
> + control_expectln("BIND");
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MULTICONN_NFDS; i++) {
> + fds[i] = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
> + if (fds[i] < 0) {
> + perror("socket");
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MULTICONN_NFDS; i++)
> + sendto_byte(fds[i], &addr.sa, sizeof(addr.svm), 1, 0);
> +
> + /* Notify the server that the client has finished */
> + control_writeln("DONE");
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MULTICONN_NFDS; i++)
> + close(fds[i]);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_dgram_multiconn_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
> +{
> + union {
> + struct sockaddr sa;
> + struct sockaddr_vm svm;
> + } addr = {
> + .svm = {
> + .svm_family = AF_VSOCK,
> + .svm_port = 1234,
> + .svm_cid = VMADDR_CID_ANY,
> + },
> + };
> + int fd;
> + int len = sizeof(addr.sa);
> + int i;
> +
> + fd = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
>
>
>
> ^^^
> I think we can check 'socket()' return value;
>
>
>
> +
> + if (bind(fd, &addr.sa, sizeof(addr.svm)) < 0) {
> + perror("bind");
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> +
> + /* Notify the client that the server is ready */
> + control_writeln("BIND");
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MULTICONN_NFDS; i++)
> + recvfrom_byte(fd, &addr.sa, &len, 1, 0);
> +
> + /* Wait for the client to finish */
> + control_expectln("DONE");
> +
> + close(fd);
> +}
> +
> static void test_stream_msg_peek_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
> {
> int fd;
> @@ -1128,6 +1306,21 @@ static struct test_case test_cases[] = {
> .run_client = test_stream_virtio_skb_merge_client,
> .run_server = test_stream_virtio_skb_merge_server,
> },
> + {
> + .name = "SOCK_DGRAM client close",
> + .run_client = test_dgram_sendto_client,
> + .run_server = test_dgram_sendto_server,
> + },
> + {
> + .name = "SOCK_DGRAM client connect",
> + .run_client = test_dgram_connect_client,
> + .run_server = test_dgram_connect_server,
> + },
> + {
> + .name = "SOCK_DGRAM multiple connections",
> + .run_client = test_dgram_multiconn_client,
> + .run_server = test_dgram_multiconn_server,
> + },
>
>
>
>
> SOCK_DGRAM guarantees message bounds, I think it will be good to add such test like in SOCK_SEQPACKET tests.
>
> Thanks, Arseniy
>
>
> {},
> };
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists