[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 13:32:51 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: brouer@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next V1] selftests/bpf: Fix check_mtu using wrong
variable type
On 06/06/2023 13.30, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> Dan Carpenter found via Smatch static checker, that unsigned
> 'mtu_lo' is never less than zero.
>
> Variable mtu_lo should have been an 'int', because read_mtu_device_lo()
> uses minus as error indications.
>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Providing the fixes like that I forgot.
Fixes: b62eba563229 ("selftests/bpf: Tests using bpf_check_mtu BPF-helper")
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c
> index 5338d2ea0460..2a9a30650350 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c
> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static void test_check_mtu_tc(__u32 mtu, __u32 ifindex)
>
> void serial_test_check_mtu(void)
> {
> - __u32 mtu_lo;
> + int mtu_lo;
>
> if (test__start_subtest("bpf_check_mtu XDP-attach"))
> test_check_mtu_xdp_attach();
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists